Many thanks Mark, I was staring at this scratching my head, but that made
it very clear, and I will pass this along. Glad to see it's not something
I botched up on my side..
---
Howard Leadmon
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
>
Thanks, but wait why am I getting resolution of the IP back? Is that
actually not valid, and it should be drilling down further but can't?
---
Howard Leadmon
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+howard=leadmon@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-
> users-bounces+
hown above.
So if anyone can offer a clue on this, it would be appreciated..
---
Howard Leadmon
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc
ter, and I have taken the time
as well to update my slaves/public servers, so it's rc2 on everything as of
this message..
---
Howard Leadmon
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+howard=leadmon@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-
> users-bounces+howard=leadmon@lis
I will grab the port update in a few, and give it a run..Worked
overnight last night, so hadn't had a chance to grab the sources, so great
timing for me..
---
Howard Leadmon
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+howard=leadmon@lists.isc.org [mailto:bi
d think that
doing a full reload on all zones, would have the same exact effect as
reloading only one, but apparently not.
---
Howard Leadmon
> -Original Message-
> From: Evan Hunt [mailto:e...@isc.org]
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 6:21 PM
> To: Howard Leadmo
the signed
zones to update, but you must specify the zone, just doing a "rndc reload"
to reload everything results in no update being performed on the signed
zone, and even a hard restart of the named process doesn't cause an update.
---
Howard Leadmon
> -Original Messag
ari named[30332]: zone leadmon.org/IN/external (signed):
serial 2012012901 (unsigned 2012012901)
Jan 30 05:23:26 minbari named[30332]: zone leadmon.org/IN/external (signed):
sending notifies (serial 2012012901)
I know for sure I am running rc1 as well:
# rndc status
version: 9.9.0rc1
[snip]
---
#x27; would get all zones, and even if that didn't, a complete restart of
named should for sure pick up the changes. This doesn't appear to be the
case, as I tried both ways, and nothing would update my signed zone till I
did a reload on the specific zone, in a specific view.
---
H
reload should reload all
zones.
---
Howard Leadmon
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan-Piet Mens [mailto:jpm...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jan-Piet
> Mens
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:47 AM
> To: Howard Leadmon
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: bind 9.9 & inli
,
or is something broken here that I have run into?
---
Howard Leadmon
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
9.8.1 port, and it works like a charm, but if this
inline signing is the key to supporting DNSSEC and being able to edit things
like I have been used to doing for years, then I will build it by hand if
needed..
---
Howard Leadmon
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Barton [mailto:do.
Thanks, I will head on over and take a look, sounds like something I should
be interested in.Now if FreeBSD would just add 9.9 to the ports
collection, it would save me from having to build it by hand..
---
Howard Leadmon
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Graff [mail
figure I am missing the solution that is hiding
someplace. Any pointers??
---
Howard Leadmon
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
h
14 matches
Mail list logo
