stination
105M 13G MASQUERADE all -- * eth+0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 105M packets, 13G bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
cheers and thanks,
Ian Veach, Senior Systems Analyst
System Computing Services, Nevada System of H
destination
You might be on to something general though: Maybe this is more of an OS
issue than a BIND issue? BIND at least seems to think it's correct!
cheers and thanks,
Ian Veach, Senior Systems Analyst
System Computing Services, Nevada System of Higher Education
On Mon, Jul 18,
arget prot opt source destination
cheers and thanks,
Ian Veach, Senior Systems Analyst
System Computing Services, Nevada System of Higher Education
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:27 PM, ian_ve...@nshe.nevada.edu <
ian_ve...@nshe.nevada.edu> wrote:
>
> I suppose, but d
er
foo-xfer.scsr.nevada.edu has address 10.10.205.230
So unless I'm crazy (possible, regardless)... named is reporting using 230,
but OS is showing 240 (and remote host logs confirm 240)!?
Thanks!!
cheers and thanks,
Ian Veach, Senior Systems Analyst
System Computing Services, Nevada Syste
ce IP... especially when the other three work
fine?
Same OS, same OS level, same (theoretical) config except for the IP
differences between machines...
Thanks for any pointers!
cheers and thanks,
Ian Veach, Senior Systems Analyst
System Computing Services, Nevada System of Higher Education
--
cal dig @OURDNS return a value?
Does anyone have other suggestions to try?
THANK YOU!
--
cheers and thanks,
Ian Veach, Systems Analyst
System Computing Services, Nevada System of Higher Education
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/
6 matches
Mail list logo