Share RPZ Zones between views

Hi all ! I'm having a problem guys, I want to know if there's a way to share RPZ zones between views in a single server. Let's say that I have a view "common" and I have in there a zone called "porn" with all the domains that I want to block, then I have 2 views that matches for 2 different IP so

Re: Share RPZ Zones between views

Hi guys, Any idea on this ? Thanks! Jose Alonso On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:50 PM, José Alonso wrote: > Hi all ! > > I'm having a problem guys, I want to know if there's a way to share RPZ > zones between views in a single server. > > Let's say that I have a vi

Re: Share RPZ Zones between views

Yeah sadly the "in-view" feature doesn't work with RPZ zones. I already tried that and also played a little bit with the "attach-cache" option but at the end it's not the desired behavior. And I have this problem, because I have 2 zones with 2 million of records that I want to block, if I load eac

Re: caching-only name server

Hi Vijay I guess that's the default value for the listen directive. With the configuration you have you should do well with the recursion only server. Regards On Friday, February 20, 2015, Vijay Viswanathan wrote: > Thanks > I thought I needed the 'port 53' line. > > > > -- > Sent from my mobi

Re: caching-only name server

> directive, i should be able to run BIND (named) as recursion only server > installed in all client machines to speed up their browsing/DNS lookup? > > Thanks. > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:29 AM, José Alonso wrote: > >> Hi Vijay >> >> I gu

DNS RPZ Zones limitation

Hi all ! I got a question, anyone knows why is there a limitation in the number of zones that can be used with RPZ (currently 32) ?? Thanks in advance, Regards -- [image: image.png] | Jose A. Hernandez | R&D Manager | MX: +52 (656) 257-1189 | US: +1 (915) 534-8116

Re: DNS RPZ Zones limitation

this moment I can only include 32 zones. If I could load more than 32 zones, it help me to properly separate what I want to block to each one my public IPs. I don't know if there's a workaround for this. On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Evan Hunt wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 04:4

Re: Bind RPZ and "in-view" clause

It should be awesome if that would be possible, I'm also looking to have that feature available, but it seems that it is not possible. Regards, On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Evan Hunt wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:24:16PM +0100, Job wrote: > > Someone has been able to make RPZ work in