am pretty sure I have those, as does isc.org.
>
> ns-ext.nrt1.isc.org. 3600 IN A 192.228.90.19
>
> So what in the world is this tool reporting?
--
Kal Feher
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
fine). So
you shouldn't worry. Sorry for the overly verbose response ;)
On 30/4/09 12:02 PM, "Sten Carlsen" wrote:
> I get the same error when checking my own domain. A check with dig
> results in proving that the tool is wrong.
>
> Scott Haneda wrote:
>> On Ap
; Query time: 1 msec
> ;; SERVER: 202.96.128.143#53(202.96.128.143)
> ;; WHEN: Mon May 11 18:51:24 2009
> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 25
>
> --- On Mon, 11/5/09, Scott Haneda wrote:
>
>>
>> I do not think you can have a .local NS. Both of
>> those NS's have to be reachab
9zAzIwMjM2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1lY
> 2gDVGV4dCBMaW5rBHRtX2xuawNVMTEwMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQDWWFob28hBHRtX3BvcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR
> tX3BwdHkDYXVueg--/SIG=14600t3ni/**http%3A//au.rd.yahoo.com/mail/tagline/creati
> veholidays/*http%3A//au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/%3Fp1=other
_
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
Kal Feher
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
S delegations.
>
> and thus I recomment not to use this for public zones - if the forwarders
> are unavailable or from some reason can't answer, the classic resolution
> will be used.
>
> I guess the configured forwarders have one of these problems
--
Kal Feher
__
The logging will prove very instructive I think. You should prioritise that
so that you can see what view the query is matching.
Is there a possibility of having either a firewall or router NAT any of the
queries? Many products will rewrite DNS queries and responses based on
static NAT rules (over
that rhel/centos8 packages
are not being built.
--
Kal Feher
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind
Replying to my own question
I just noticed #1258 in Gitlab bind9/issues is on the same topic.
If the OS release was not listed on the isc copr site, it might be less
confusing.
On 17 Oct 2019, 11:08 AM +1100, Kal Feher , wrote:
> The copr repositories for centos8 appear to be empty of
nothing in the logs indicating an error loading previous keys.
Am I missing something?
--
Kal Feher
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://l
10 matches
Mail list logo
