On 04.04.23 15:11, Josh Kuo wrote:
Hi all,
[...]
The only one I know of is the very dated US OMB memo from 2008. I see
several European domains have better DNSSEC deployment rates (such as
.de). Are there any regulations or friendly recommendations from some
kind of governing body at work
On 01.04.19 11:18, Petr Mensik wrote:
Hi Klaus,
[...]
Thanks for the response. I have seen the LDAP implementation, but haven't looked
deeper into it. Maybe I will.
The main problem is that I don't know which zones I will have to serve
beforehand, and they may be many and may change
Hi all,
first of all, if this is not the right list for such questions, please redirect
me.
I am exploring the DynDB API of BIND whether it could help us to solve our
needs. As I have played around with DLZ quite a few years ago, I was pleased to
see a new interface seemingly resolving
Hi,
can someone please briefly explain how to submit a bug report? I think I have
found a small bug causing a protocol error in Bind 9.7.7 (and obviously still
existent in 9.9.2) and would like the ISC people know about.
Regards,
Klaus
___
Please
On 18/10/10 01:16, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/16/2010 4:58 AM, Klaus Malorny wrote:
[...]
It's virtually certain that you would get better results with less effort by
switching to using dynamic updates.
hth,
Doug
Hi Doug,
well, I considered this, but as far as I understand
Hi,
for one project we are using the traditional file based approach, where we
update the zone files and call rndc to notify Bind about the changes. At some
point I asked myself whether we could avoid calling rndc over and over and
instead directly communicating with Bind, even if the
Hi,
I don't know whether this is the right place to ask, sorry if not.
I am currently chasing a problem with DNAMEs: If I have a zone, say,
example.net. SOA
example.net. NS ...
example.net. DNAME example.com.
, I have the strange problem that this does not work in a Bind-DLZ
7 matches
Mail list logo
