Peter Dambier escreveu:
I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB.
That cpu can address no more than 16 MB.
i have tried running 9.4.3 instead of 9.5.0-P2 and got odd results.
9.5.0-P2 right after start. Not a single query was made to it,
Gregory Hicks escreveu:
Greetings:
Seeing in my named.log entries for too many timeouts resolving
'some-domain-not-seen-before'... makes me wonder if my server is an
open recursive server.
Where is the test please for open recursion so I can check?
JINMEI Tatuya / escreveu:
question is is there something i can do to low bind's memory
usage and successfully run it on those very low embedded devices ???
Admittedly, BIND9 tends to require a lot of memory. I'm not sure if
it can reasonably function with a total system
Peter Dambier escreveu:
I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB.
That cpu can address no more than 16 MB.
$ cat /proc/meminfo
total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 14540800 10596352 398 3194880 1003520 3518464
Hi,
i'm trying to run bind 9.5.0-P2 on a very low memory system. It's a
RouterBoard 450 with 32Mb RAM running OpenWRT.
r...@sede:~# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:29920 kB
the problem is that bind seems to consume a LOT of memory ... well,
a lot for low memory devices, i never
5 matches
Mail list logo
