Thanks all for your inputs!!
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:50:14PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote:
> > > I do dig . +trace and the results seem show .new servers. This is
> > > causing SERVFAI
ly local) DNS toolset.
>
> HTH,
> Len
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 3, 2015 11:47 AM, Linux Addict <
> linuxaddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Actually I tried +trace from BIND server itself and still get the same
> answer. I did "dig . +trace @localho
Let me take a step back. The original problem is "dig ." would give
SERVFAIL instead of NOERROR. The "." is pointed to named.ca which looks
normal.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
> Actually I tried +trace from BIND server itself and still get the sa
.new name servers. You
> need to ask whomever manages that server.
>
> Look at this line from your +trace output:
>
> Received 405 bytes from 172.27.254.11#53(172.27.254.11) in 1 ms
>
> Lyle
>
>
> On 2/3/2015 1:13 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
>
> Additional info - g
Additional info - general: warning: checkhints: unable to find root NS
'b.root-servers.new' in hints
I cant seem to find where the ".new" coming from...
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
> The named.ca seems good.
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> .
t;
> Is your machine/shop setup with private root servers?
>
> Lyle
>
>
> On 2/3/2015 12:50 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
>
> I do dig . +trace and the results seem show .new servers. This is
> causing SERVFAIL for root query. Any ideas?
>
> dig . +trace
>
> ;
I do dig . +trace and the results seem show .new servers. This is causing
SERVFAIL for root query. Any ideas?
dig . +trace
; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P1 <<>> . +trace
;; global options: +cmd
. 348510 IN NS b.root-servers.new.
. 348510 IN NS
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 17/05/10 16:59, Arcan_- wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the reply.
>>
>> Interesting. What's the use-case for this?
>>>
>>
>> I have a few hundreds of dhcp clients and a two nodes pseudo cluster (for
>> the VIP).
>> I need a solution that enable hi
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> On May 4, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Linux Addict wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:27:25AM -0400,
>> Linux Addict wrote
>> a message of 8
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:27:25AM -0400,
> Linux Addict wrote
> a message of 89 lines which said:
>
> > lacks EDNS, defaults to 512"
> > DNS reply size limit is at least 490"
> > "Test
Hello Folks, I got a strange issue going on..
I dig for a specific record against a ISP cache server , and the cache
server doesn't seem to see it, but When I do dig +any, then the record stays
in the cache for say 5minutes and then vanishes.
any idea?
~LA
___
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Prabhat Rana wrote:
>
> Also you may want to increase the File descriptor limits in /etc/service
> file
> * Set File descriptor (FD) limits
> set rlim_fd_max=
>
Its /etc/system
>
>
> --- On Thu, 2/26/09, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
>
> > From: JINMEI Tatuya /
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jeff Howard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Having a problem setting up split DNS for the purpose of separating
> internal, recursive, caching responses vs external, non caching, non
> recusrive responses. First off, can views be used to do this?
>
> If yes, here are the rel
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:03 PM, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
wrote:
> At Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:23:02 +0100,
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> > Q 1:Which setting is missing?
> >
> > Q2: Can someone tell me how to update a TXT record?
>
> Please show named.conf of the authoritative server (the one accept
Dmitry Rybin wrote:
Linux Addict wrote:
Folks, I have BIND 9 running. For some reason, the external resolution
is not working. I can telnet to root servers on port 53. Recursion is
on. What are the other requiremnts for the server to reesolve the
external records. Please help!!
TCP
Folks, I have BIND 9 running. For some reason, the external resolution is
not working. I can telnet to root servers on port 53. Recursion is on. What
are the other requiremnts for the server to reesolve the external records.
Please help!!
~LA
___
bind-us
16 matches
Mail list logo
