Re: Is an IPv6-only glue/delegation record a problem in a world of IPv4?

2010-01-13 Thread Mathew J. Newton
On Mon, January 11, 2010 9:10 pm, Matthew Pounsett wrote: I suspect that, even though they threw an error, your registrar went ahead and passed on the same IPv4 address for both name servers to the registry. I think this may have been the problem... I went back in to the registrar's DNS

Is an IPv6-only glue/delegation record a problem in a world of IPv4?

2010-01-11 Thread Mathew J. Newton
I would be grateful if someone might be able to shed some light on an apparent problem I've got with an experimental DNS I have setup. Specifically, the Dig tool at http://www.kloth.net/services/dig.php seems unable to resolve my records and I can't help but feel it's a problem at my end rather

Re: Is an IPv6-only glue/delegation record a problem in a world of IPv4?

2010-01-11 Thread Mathew J. Newton
On Mon, January 11, 2010 5:57 pm, Rick Dicaire wrote: While this is not in response to your original question, I am curious. I'm not sure if you were part of the discussion we just had on IRC freenode #ipv6, but querying a .org TLD NS for records for ns1 and ns2.v6ns.org return no

Re: Is an IPv6-only glue/delegation record a problem in a world of IPv4?

2010-01-11 Thread Mathew J. Newton
On Mon, January 11, 2010 6:27 pm, Miles Mccredie wrote: FWIW, this is what I'm seeing from an IPv4 only host. Not sure if the unexpected source is the problem that kloth.net is seeing or whether it's the result of putting *;; reply from unexpected source: 77.103.161.36#60741, expected

Re: Is an IPv6-only glue/delegation record a problem in a world of IPv4?

2010-01-11 Thread Mathew J. Newton
On Mon, January 11, 2010 8:33 pm, Matthew Pounsett wrote: The problem may be at Kloth.. but at least one of the many possible problems they might be having could be corrected by a slightly different configuration at your end. Thanks Matt for your (and others) continued help with this - it is