: DNSSEC and nsupdate
Setting the permissions of a *private* key to 0644 sounds like a bad idea.
Maybe you mean 0640?
On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 23:28:28 +
"Prof. Dr. Michael Schefczyk" <mich...@schefczyk.net> wrote:
> Dear Mark,
>
> I did get the issue resolved while sett
key-directory "/var/lib/bind";
auto-dnssec maintain;
};
Regards,
Michael Schefczyk
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 26. Februar 2018 01:57
An: Prof. Dr. Michael Schefczyk <mich...@schefczyk.net>
Cc: b
convention of K[fqdn]+number+keyid.key or
.private anymore?
Regards,
Michael
Technische Universität Dresden
Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Lehrstuhl für Entrepreneurship und Innovation
Prof. Dr. Michael Schefczyk
D-01062 Dresden
Fon: +49
Dear All,
For a long time already, I am using a bind master DNS server based on debian
set up via webmin. It is currently Debian Stretch with bind 9.10. I am using
DNSSEC.
The webmin setup leads to all keys being stored in /var/lib/bind. The naming
scheme is K[fqdn]+number+keyid.key or
4 matches
Mail list logo