Re: Help with unresolvable domain (subdomain, actually)

2011-03-01 Thread Shaoquan Lin
86400 IN NS sjck-dmz-gss1.cisco.com. ;; Received 226 bytes from 64.102.255.44#53(ns2.cisco.com) in 27 ms tools.cisco.com.20 IN A 128.107.242.16 ;; Received 49 bytes from 64.102.246.5#53(rtp5-dmz-gss1.cisco.com) in 32 ms You might be able to reolve it now too. --

Re: [SOLVED] Re: BIND9 SERVFAIL on some .gov addresses

2011-02-23 Thread Shaoquan Lin
.123.30) ;; WHEN: Wed Feb 23 11:12:48 2011 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 192 Does this show we do have a firewall problem here? Shaoquan Lin Mark Andrews wrote: In message <0539E64AD2B54AD2804C2394F923800B@se179>, "Shaoquan Lin" writes: Mark, Are these bugs (2784 and 1804) fixe

Re: [SOLVED] Re: BIND9 SERVFAIL on some .gov addresses

2011-02-22 Thread Shaoquan Lin
o set "tc"? Thank you. Shaoquan Lin - Original Message - From: "Mark Andrews" To: "Shaoquan Lin" Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 6:08 AM Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Re: BIND9 SERVFAIL on some .gov addresses In message <17894D6D30484DDFBBE95BEF9

Re: [SOLVED] Re: BIND9 SERVFAIL on some .gov addresses

2011-02-18 Thread Shaoquan Lin
. Using options "max-udp-size 512" and "edns-udp-size 512" does not solve the problem. The following are the what I captured. Anyone have any suggestions to solve the problem? Shaoquan Lin BIND 9.3 query: Domain Name System (query) Transaction ID: 0