86400 IN NS sjck-dmz-gss1.cisco.com.
;; Received 226 bytes from 64.102.255.44#53(ns2.cisco.com) in 27 ms
tools.cisco.com.20 IN A 128.107.242.16
;; Received 49 bytes from 64.102.246.5#53(rtp5-dmz-gss1.cisco.com) in 32 ms
You might be able to reolve it now too.
--
.123.30)
;; WHEN: Wed Feb 23 11:12:48 2011
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 192
Does this show we do have a firewall problem here?
Shaoquan Lin
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <0539E64AD2B54AD2804C2394F923800B@se179>, "Shaoquan Lin" writes:
Mark,
Are these bugs (2784 and 1804) fixe
o set "tc"?
Thank you.
Shaoquan Lin
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Andrews"
To: "Shaoquan Lin"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Re: BIND9 SERVFAIL on some .gov addresses
In message <17894D6D30484DDFBBE95BEF9
. Using options "max-udp-size
512" and "edns-udp-size 512" does not solve the problem.
The following are the what I captured. Anyone have any suggestions to solve
the problem?
Shaoquan Lin
BIND 9.3 query:
Domain Name System (query)
Transaction ID: 0
4 matches
Mail list logo