On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 22:31:19 -0500, Robert Spangler wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 December 2008 20:13, Scott Haneda wrote:
>
>> Trying to help a client, they stumped me today.
>
> OK, I get the sam answers form all the NS servers.
>
>> dig crm.share-ideas.com
>>
>> ; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> crm.sh
NSWER SECTION:
> crm.share-ideas.com.3600IN CNAME share-ideas.com.
>
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> share-ideas.com.3600IN SOA ns1.hc.ru.
> support.hc.ru. 2008110347 3600 1800 604800 3600
>
> ;; Query time: 371 msec
> ;; SERVER: 89.111.171.191#53(89.111.
For all my attempts to read the manual on DIG I can't find a way to do
something really simple.
Is there a way to dig a domain name so even if the results are in cache,
it will ignore these and re-read them? It's really from a testing
perspective I'm looking at this. I can mash the keyboard eac
ou're referring to the cache on the server you're trying to query,
> sorry, that's beyond your control, unless you have root on that server.
>
> -wes
>
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Stephen Ward <
> stephen.usenet.w...@wibblywobblyteapot.co.uk> wrote:
>
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:24:04 +, Chris Thompson wrote:
> On Jan 5 2009, John Wobus wrote:
>
>>[...] There is no nameserver
>>operation
>>that dig could do to tell a caching nameserver to act differently for
>>one query. Y
Just a quick silly question.
Running BIND9 (someone kindly raped to get it to work on windows) but it
does not seem to support CIDR ranges. I mostly use it to block unwanted
email by connecting IP (glorified reverse DNS).
Rather than have to enter loads of lines to match up wide spans of ranges
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 21:28:55 -0500, Frank Bulk wrote:
> There are other DNS servers that do a better job for RBLs.
>
> Frank
I'm listening.
Replica Watches - TRY LIDL - Cheap meds? Visit your GP
--
. . .
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@
7 matches
Mail list logo
