Joe Baptista bapti...@publicroot.org wrote:
Someone else has written the RFC draft - which see http://bit.ly/b5mFkV
That draft has this text, Expires: February 27, 2010 [3 days from
today]. I am not sure what an expiration date means officially on a
draft RFC.
In production I am running BIND 9.6.1-P3 on Solaris 9,
sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240. When I start BIND I get this message:
Jan 25 11:03:17 dns1 named[9673]: [ID 873579 daemon.notice]
built with '--prefix=/export/home/named/bind'
'--with-openssl=/krb5'
On a mail machine I am running a cache-only DNS - BIND 9.6.1-P3.
When I dump the cache I see two lines:
; answer
brainpower-austria.at. 6622MX 5 mx1.bon.at.
I then enter
./rndc flushname brainpower-austria.at
But when I then look at the cache, I still see the MX record
jim.siffe...@tektronix.com wrote:
Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2)
as AD Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a
single MS DNS server to our BIND 9 servers that handle recursion. Is
there a reliable way to use multiple masters when slaving
Jukka Pakkanen jukka.pakka...@qnet.fi wrote:
Our Bind 9.6.1-P1 Windows servers are slaves to a Windows 2003 DNS
server, zone company.local.
For some reason t he slaves don't update the zone unless I restart the
BIND service in the server, and after a while, fail to respond to queries.
Bradley Caricofe wrote:
Hey list,
I have the following issue. A customer hosts a domain with me,
facplus.com. Her primary email account is on that domain, we'll call
it her at facplus.com. She has also registered another name through
Dotster, meetingtoolsandjewels.com. Dotster provides her
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Tim Huffmant...@bobbroadband.com
wrote:
Guys,
We're a smallish (but growing) ISP, and we've been asked by one of our
customers to delegate reverse DNS for 63.250.251.0/24 to their DNS servers,
ns1.emns.com - ns4.emns.com. Unfortunately, we've never had to
Emery emery.rudo...@gmail.com wrote:
I've conducted two maintenance windows to upgrade our BIND primary
server to the new code to address the recent security vulnerability, but
cannot get past the error below. I have Openssl 9.8.0k installed. I have
no problems running tests from the openssl
gui gco...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
i have s strange probleme with my bind server, and i hope someone
could point out the problem, here is the description,
i have two bind servers (replication, multi-master), bind 9.3.4, same
version, same configuration (normally).
I tried to do some PTR
This is not really a BIND-related question, but I thought that maybe
some people on this list can point me in the right direction.
Maybe someone has already done what I need to do.
I have one zone
xxx.yyy.example.com
that is on a Windows DNS server, completely under the control of
Windows.
Frank Bulk wrote:
If you change the nameservers for IllinoisAcceleratorInstitute.org at its
registrar to point to t1dns1.anl.gov and t1dns2.anl.gov you should be good
to go.
and Andy Shellam andy-li...@networkmail.eu replied:
And not forgetting to change the master server in the SOA record
Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote, in part:
The problem (NS going to CNAME) was properly identified by Hauke Lampe
very soon in the thread. Read it.
Unable to find primary nameserver (SOA)
Well, the error message could be better, that's sure...
There are a number of reasons why the
We own the domain
IllinoisAcceleratorInstitute.org
There are problems accessing this domain from the Internet, and I cannot
determine what the problem is. I have no trouble from Argonne, as the
domain is slaved on all of my servers. I do not see any problem with
the delegations, but I may
I have a name server that is authoritative for the zone
tlh.fl.us.
In that zone is a record
freenet.tlh.fl.us. IN CNAME tfn.net.
My server is not authoritative for tfn.net.
Some external client sends a request:
What is the MX for freenet.tlh.fl.us.?
My server responds
Ronni Jensen r...@mvb.dk wrote:
Hi,
Every night I have a perl script generate a config file which contains
approximately 5000 zones at the moment, but this will vary in size as
zones are added/removed.
However, when I put include /etc/special-zones.conf; into
named.conf and do rndc reconfig,
In gnkslg$3u...@sf1.isc.org Mark Andrews mark_andr...@isc.org writes:
In message 937393c4-77a8-4dba-8a4f-14560c25c...@o11g2000yql.googlegroups.com,
SN writes:
libcrypto.so.0.9.8 is not being found as a link library. Trying to
run as in a chroot'ed environment on solaris 10 (core install).
On 19.02.09 12:26, Nuno Ribeiro wrote:
There is a CNAME Record www.example.test.com CNAME ts.example.test2.com
in the example.test.com zone, which my nameserver is not authoritive. My
name server is authoritive for example.test2.com zone.
I receive a A query for www.example.test.com. I send
Al Stu al_...@verizon.net wrote:
How about these two?
nullmx.domainmanager.com
Non-authoritative answer:
Name:mta.dewile.net
Address: 69.59.189.80
Aliases: nullmx.domainmanager.com
smtp.secureserver.net
Non-authoritative answer:
Name:smtp.where.secureserver.net
Address:
I have not copied the entire thread.
You've added an additional step in your second paragraph that is
prohibited by the section you quoted in the first. The section from
the RFC describes a situation where A is queried for and an MX record
pointing to B is returned. When B is queried for,
Davenport, Steve M sdave...@mc.utmck.edu wrote, in part,
Hello,
We have nameservers supporting utmck.edu and delegate the zones used by
Windows to Windows nameservers as follows:
...
When I do a nslookup or dig I only see the first two servers and not
sec2:
--
ns-1:
Nicholas F Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of questions regarding how a Microsoft domain
controller updates a dynamic zone.
1 ) When a domain controller tries to update the zone does it try the
DNS servers it has listed in its network settings or does it follow
the SOA for
21 matches
Mail list logo
