e's nameservers? What's
preventing you from setting up a second recursive nameserver in each office?
John
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Jeronimo L. Cabral wrote:
> Dear John, this is my scenario:
>
> 1) Office 1: people work with some machines and fill up a local master
&g
nual:
"Forwarding occurs only on those queries for which the server is not
authoritative and does not have the answer in its cache."
What exactly are you trying to achieve?
John
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Jeronimo L. Cabral wrote:
> Dear, I would like to ask for solution rela
Hi Roberto,
Yep, that should do it.
John
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Roberto Carna wrote:
> Dear, what are the dig syntaxis in order to get a reverse zone
> transfer from a DNS server ???
>
> is this correct:
>
> dig @ 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa axfr
>
> T
nto config management
it goes.
John
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Roberto Carna wrote:
> OK Jeff, thanksso the only way to write these bottom lines in the
> Slave is by hand (except if use scp or something similar)???
>
> zone "company.com" {
> type
would be a good thing to know.
John Wobus
Cornell U
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Are you trying to override the IP address locally, or are you just trying
to get the correct value into cache?
John
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:52 AM, houguanghua wrote:
> Hi all,
> Bind provides rndc tools to operate the cache. But how to change a record
> in the cache. For example:
&g
rom derived A or records.
>
>
> Vernon Schryverv...@rhyolite.com
>
Indeed, the intent of my words was that SPF only makes sense if it's
public--presumably you set up trust between your internal mail servers in
other ways. It's not required for SMTP to work--plen
lic as well?
If everything can be public, why the question? If you want internal-only
records, why not just do split horizon of some sort where you use zoneedit
as a slave and your local BIND view as a master? That way you have two
views, one for internal IPs, and one for external IPs.
that Gmail (or
whoever) would suddenly start sending so much spam that it would swamp
the real mail and make them worth listing are extremely low.
I realize there are DNSBLs that list on the merest whiff of spam and
don't care if they block legitimate mail. That's not what we're
tal
A friend (really) asks this question: they have some DNSBLs, which get
a lot of queries. Sometimes the answer has A or TXT records, meaning
the corresponding address is listed in the DNSBL, sometimes it's
NXDOMAIN which means the address isn't.
For addresses that aren't listed, some of the NXDOMA
ry-errors (can’t remember which off the top of my
head).
>
Yup, that was it :-) I had no 'query-errors' logging set up. I now see
the queries being rate-limited (or they would be if I removed/changed
the 'log-only' option.)
Thanks,
John.
__
bind
logs contain anything about rate limiting).
Thanks,
John.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Large cheap hosting services like
Godaddy do not deal well with exceptions. Pointing the 2LD at your
servers is normal, delegating a subdomain is an exception.
If you have web or other hosting there, you can still point the DNS
records back at them as needed
>>>xyz.gov.in. DNAME xyz.in.
>On 01.01.14 18:16, John Levine wrote:
>>Except that DNAME only applies to names under xyz.gov.in, not to
>>xyz.gov.in itself.
>
>Usually because xyz.gov.in must already have SOA and NS records and
>therefore it's not possib
he same file to zone files for both
>domains as Leonard Mills recommended.
is the easiest way to do it if you're using BIND.
R's,
John
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bin
On 12/11/2013 08:42 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <52a8e44a.1070...@brandeis.edu>, John Miller writes:
Hello folks,
I'm getting ready to revamp our dynamic DNS setup here on campus, and am
curious: what is everyone doing for update forwarding? Have you seen
certain clients tha
been bitten by leaving update
forwarding disabled?
John
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
I would add that Windows PC OSs by default have the dns client cache set to
'enable'.
John Manson
U.S. House of Representatives | HIR Data Communications | Washington, DC 20515
Desk: 202-226-4244 | NCC: 202-226-6430 | john.man...@mail
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:08:33 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:06:07AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> On 10/13/2013 10:34 PM, John Oliver wrote:
>>
>> >Venting aside, does anyone have a contact at GoDaddy that doesn't
>> >suffer from a ter
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:08:33 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:06:07AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> On 10/13/2013 10:34 PM, John Oliver wrote:
>>
>> >Venting aside, does anyone have a contact at GoDaddy that doesn't
>> >suffer from a ter
s all my fault, and I should abandon IPv6 because
it just doesn't work with DNSSEC?
Venting aside, does anyone have a contact at GoDaddy that doesn't suffer
from a terminal case of rectal-cranial invesrion? I'm mainly
experimenting with DNSSEC, and don't want to
>Please forgive my ignorance, and sorry about all the details. I have
>not been able to find a detailed specification.
TXT records haven't changed since RFC 1034 and 1035.
You can have multiple strings per record, and multiple records per
name. At the application level, some applications glom mu
>How, precisely, is the second (or third) string added?
plugh.example TXT "foo" "bar"
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.o
essed by a "best practice"?
-If neither of the above, is there
a "hidden practice that knowing folk
often follow to dodge remote
nameserver deficiencies"?
FYI, I only received the report fourth hand
and can't tell you the nameserver software
that had this issue.
J
To add to Len's comments, bind will keep going to the partially broken Fedora
dns as long as it has the fastest response time.
As a short term fix, you can use the 'blackhole' option to prevent your dns
from sending queries to that IP.
John Manson
U.S. House of Representat
looking to run a nameserver
hosted in EC2/Rackspace/etc., you can install whatever DNS server you
like--you're managing the box yourself.
John
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Odimegwu David wrote:
> Is it possible for one to configure BIND or any DNS implementation for the
> cloud?
>
browser never asks for
anything but an A record, which succeeds.
I've contacted the site in question with this info, so hopefully it'll
get resolved. I'll keep the list posted on any results or info for
posterity.
-John
--
Please consider the environment bef
tion,
you need to understand the innards and be prepared to do your own
maintenance, or you need to pay someone for support.
John
On 08/21/2013 02:34 PM, Manish Rane wrote:
Hi Guys,
Is there any ISO or virtual appliance available for BIND? Which ease out
the deploy and configur
it is a client issue.
On the other hand if both give the same unwanted answer,
you have evidence it is a server configuration issue.
John Wobus
Cornell University IT
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from
nward. Do not bother
using +trace when your system is not by default performing the entire
resolution. When you find the system which is failing to resolve the
name, then you know it is a problem w/ that system and it's next step
towards the internet.
-- John
On 7/23/2013 12:35 PM,
On 07/18/2013 06:07 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article ,
John Miller wrote:
I think what I was getting at was whether appending $ORIGIN to an
unqualified target--only talking target, not label--was _required_ by the
RFCs, and if so, the RFC/section. I'll read through 'em; was j
Hi Ryan,
Sorry I wasn't more clear in my original post. Barry hit the nail on
the head: I was curious if the RFCs required BIND to append $ORIGIN to
targets that aren't fully qualified. Sounds like they do.
I appreciate the help!
John
On 07/18/2013 05:59 PM, Novosielski,
On 07/18/2013 06:07 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article ,
John Miller wrote:
I think what I was getting at was whether appending $ORIGIN to an
unqualified target--only talking target, not label--was _required_ by the
RFCs, and if so, the RFC/section. I'll read through 'em; was j
FC 1034, page 34.
R's,
John
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2013, at 1:18 PM, John Miller wrote:
> > I know that for the following record in example.com's zone file:
> >
> > host.example.com. IN CNAME otherhost
> >
> > BIND will retur
CNAME otherhost.
be equally valid from an RFC perspective? Obviously this would also
pertain to NS, MX, SRV, PTR, etc. records.
John
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:12 PM, John Miller wrote:
> Hey there folks,
>
> I know that for the following record in a zone file:
>
> host.exampl
Hey there folks,
I know that for the following record in a zone file:
host.example.com.
--
John Miller
Systems Engineer
Brandeis University
johnm...@brandeis.edu
(781) 736-4619
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
IPV6 poses challenges for some
DNS strategies, e.g. setting up static "placeholder" DNS records
for each address in a dynamically-addressed subnet.
John
Cornell University IT
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubsc
experience is: the RRL
patch, used with its default parameters, simply does the job.
John
Cornell University IT
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users
se domains that
are incorrectly set up.
The ideal way to fix the issue is to get the owner of
the domain to fix it.
John
Cornell University IT
On Jul 5, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Fosiul Alam wrote:
Hi
thanks for reply,
I am not the domain admin for "rbcaa.co.za"
I can see they have issue wit
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 12:02 -0700, Eduardo Bonsi wrote:
> On 7/2/13 9:35 AM, John Horne wrote:
> >
> > We were alerted to the problem because we got long delays (around 20
> > seconds) when accessing a site doing a reverse lookup. That service
> > then, no doubt
oing a reverse lookup. That service
then, no doubt the same as with SMTP, then proceeded but without the
reverse lookup answer.
John.
--
John Horne, Plymouth University, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001
___
Please visit https:/
Give each instance of named a unique name:
A-named, b-named, etc
- Original Message -
From: bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 08:00 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: bind-users Digest, Vol 1560, Issue 1
Send
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 17:20 +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 25/06/13 16:53, John Horne wrote:
>
> > servers. However, there is a whole load of muttering that Microsoft and
> > AD won't like that; it's all integrated with each other; running the DNS
> > zone on Li
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 17:07 +0100, Steven Carr wrote:
> On 25 June 2013 16:53, John Horne wrote:
> > So what I now do not understand is why (at home) I can do several
> > reverse lookups for different IP addresses, and they all give me an
> > answer. Likewise i
that the internal servers should be just that - internal.
Ideal would be moving the reverse zone onto the Internet-facing Linux
servers. However, there is a whole load of muttering that Microsoft and
AD won't like that; it's all integrated with each other; running the DNS
zone on Linux servers w
they are only
provided by our internal servers, then all the lookups should fail.
Comments? Corrections to where I have gone wrong?
I should point out that I have for a long time banged on at management
about the fact that our internal name servers are visible on the
Internet but cannot be acc
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 17:11 +0100, John Horne wrote:
>
> My understanding is that RPZ can do this, but I just cannot seem to
> configure the RPZ zone file to enable this. The zone file contains:
> =
> $TTL 1H
> @ SOA LOCALHOST. hostmaster.plymouth.ac.
ill returns both 'dns0' and 'dns1'. Likewise using just '.' as the
rdata made no difference.
So, I'm wondering what the RPZ zone file should contain to enable an NS
record to be omitted from the reply?
Thanks,
John.
--
John Horne, Plymouth University, UK
Tel
, so
won't make any assumptions there.
That said, some general info: outside MXes use authoritative DNS to send to
you; your incoming MX servers use recursive DNS to do any reverse lookups
on sender IPs, to query DNSBLs, and to get SPF/DKIM/DMARC info; outgoing
MXes use recursive DNS to find outside MX
it's clear that your issue
is with BIND and how you've configured it.
John
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Norman,
>
> It's virtually certain that the error you're seeing is not related to
> BIND. You would almost certainly get your pro
We are running Bind 9.9.2 and would like to invoke the rate-limit option but
named says 'unknown option'.
Do we need to upgrade bind to get this option?
Using this syntax:
rate-limit { responses-per-second 5; window 5; };
Thanks
John Manson
US House of Representatives
CAO/HI
ore, and there are at least that many
open resolvers (think random networked printers and such) so a factor
of 4 in the amplification ratio isn't important.
When Doug said they were switching to chargen, he wasn't kidding.
There's an unlimited number of
>So, may I infer that rather than being put off until the end of the
>century, which seemed to be the previous implementation timeline,
>pervasive implementation of BCP 38 may now be expected at around the
>time that 32-bit UNIX clocks are anticipated to wrap-around to negative?
Perhaps, but I thi
>>The real solution is BCP 38...
>
>I agree completely John. I cannot do otherwise. But I have to ask the
>obvious elephant-in-the-room question... How is that comming along so far?
Based on discussions I've had with people who work at large networks
and in policy
.
The real solution is BCP 38, to keep spoofed packets out of the
network in the first place. With widely implemented BCP 38, open
resolvers wouldn't matter since you could only DoS yourself, or at
worst someone else on your own network segment.
R's,
John
_
ries. It's a pretty common
anti-malware/anti-spam practice, and also gets used (for example) in
wifi captive portals.
John
On 06/03/2013 03:36 PM, Ward, Mike S wrote:
Hello all, I was trying to follow the thread on the NXDOMAIN and got lost. :) I
have a question about using forwarders.
A-record answers. It's up to the zone's maintainer to assure
the (hopefully temporary) inconsistency doesn't cause issues.
John Wobus
Cornell Univ IT
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 06:53 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <1369923655.1952.6.camel@jhorne.config>, John Horne writes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I noticed in the 9.3.3 announcement the following new SPF check:
> >
> >Adds a new configuratio
t=1
If it is being deprecated, then checking for an SPF record and finding
no corresponding TXT record makes sense, but finding a TXT record and
warning that there is no SPF record would seem a little pointless.
John.
--
John Horne, Plymouth University, UK
Tel:
>> Any chance someone can correct the settings on this mailing list to
>> reply to the list by default instead of the user posting the message?
This is a religious argument. Please, leave it alone.
>And, If I might add, adding a tag to the subject like [bind-users] would
>be extremely nice.
It'
my resolv.conf looks like
nameserver 10.10.10.10
nameserver 10.10.10.20
search path1.mydomain.com path2.mydomain.com
I would expect if I type the following:
dig myhost
It would search for that host in path1 or path2 listed above. It does not, a
+trace shows the resolver querying the root
If the 'type' info in a zone statement determines master or slave, can you have
2 views in the same named.conf file, one with type master zones and the other
with type slave zones?
John Manson
CAO/HIR/NAF Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington,
DC 20515
from not delegating to dc1 as well, and not
including glue for both of the dc2 IPs. Any reason not to delegate/glue
dc1 as well?
> Anyways...I guess at this point the problem lies with the ADS setup
>
>
Definitely could be. But make sure your delegation is rock-solid first.
nto this, it looks as though the department may
have set their AD domain up as "foo.example.com" when in reality it should
be "ads.foo.example.com." Can you clarify this?
John
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
all slaves so
they get notifies from both.
I'm guessing it has to do with being master for a zone and not acting on
notifies it may receive.
Thanks
John Manson
CAO/HIR/NAF Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington,
DC 20515
Desk: 202-226-4244 | TCC: 202-226
I searched www.isc.org<http://www.isc.org> to no avail.
Is bind 9.9.x compatible with Solaris 11?
Anything out of the ordinary with compiling and such?
Thanks
John Manson
CAO/HIR/NAF Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington,
DC 20515
Desk: 202-226-4244 | TCC: 2
DNAME?
Or SRV records. Surely browsers are adding support
in the next day or two?
John
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https
http://www.digwebinterface.com/? Is one of the internet sites I use.
John Manson
CAO/HIR/NAF Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington,
DC 20515
Desk: 202-226-4244 | TCC: 202-226-6430 |
john.man...@mail.house.gov<mailto:john.man...@mail.house.
mailto:cli...@buxtonfamily.us]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:57 PM
To: Manson, John
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Recursion issue
On Mar 28, 2013, at 9:05 AM, Manson, John wrote:
> I disagree with your statement about recursion.
> What stops an authoritative server from doing recursi
, 2013 11:49 AM
To: Manson, John
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Recursion issue
On Mar 28, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Manson, John wrote:
> From the internet:
> Answer records
>
> name class typedatatime to live
> test.gopleader.govIN CNAME testwww.house.g
:
test.gopleader@mercury.house.gov:
test.gopleader.gov. 300 IN CNAME testwww.house.gov.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buxton [mailto:cli...@buxtonfamily.us]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:49 AM
To: Manson, John
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Recursion issue
On Mar 28
:15:00)
So the first lookup does not fully resolve due to recursion.
Does this help?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buxton [mailto:cli...@buxtonfamily.us]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:13 AM
To: Manson, John
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Recursion issue
On Mar 28, 2013,
e the House server name displayed in the
browser url bar and in dig results.
Thanks
John Manson
CAO/HIR/NAF Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington,
DC 20515
Desk: 202-226-4244 | TCC: 202-226-6430 |
john.man...@mail.house.gov<mailto:john.
Will dig and rndc be updated as well?
Thanks
John Manson
CAO/HIR/NAF Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington,
DC 20515
Desk: 202-226-4244 | TCC: 202-226-6430 |
john.man...@mail.house.gov<mailto:john.man...@mail.house.gov>
se.
Thanks
John Manson
CAO/HIR/NAF Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington,
DC 20515
Desk: 202-226-4244 | TCC: 202-226-6430 |
john.man...@mail.house.gov<mailto:john.man...@mail.house.gov>
___
Please visit https://lists
>It is or would have been, very little cost to publish SPF records.
Not until we fix the provisioning problem. (News flash: in 99.9% of
the Internet, people do not edit master files with vi.)
In the early days of SPF, it was remarkably hard to get TXT records
provisioned, even though TXT records
>I've not been keeping up with the IETF; is there a document that
>describes what looks like a de facto standard of using _pname labels
>with TXT RRs that is being followed by at least DMARC and DANE in
>*._tcp.example.com, *._smimecert.example.com, and _dmarc.example.com
No, but Dave Crocker is w
for future efforts of
the SPF-sort, and it's been fortunate for the
SPF effort that TXT records were available to them without
a lot of earlier-established complicated rules of use, so they
could use TXT records to jump-start their efforts.
John Wobus
Cornell U
___
n't
ideal. Far better to separate things out.
John
Verne
Verne Britton, Lead Systems Programmer voice: (304) 293-5192 x230
Systems Support Group(in WV, call 1-800-253-1558)
West Virginia Net
Syslog-ng
Use the named default logging.
John Manson
CAO/HIR/NAF Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington,
DC 20515
Desk: 202-226-4244 | TCC: 202-226-6430 |
john.man...@mail.house.gov<mailto:john.man...@mail.house.
Thanks, Matus. Much appreciated--a SERVFAIL is much better than an
NXDOMAIN in this scenario.
John
On 02/21/2013 10:41 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 21.02.13 10:38, John Miller wrote:
Here's something I hadn't put much thought into until recently--it's
never been a
RVFAIL, but I
could see NXDOMAIN as well. Does anyone know the answer?
John
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Just to cover all the bases, you're doing your lookup directly against
your server, correct? Easy to accidentally query a different nameserver
and not see what you're expecting.
Otherwise I'd second Warren's suggestion to double-check your serial number.
John
On
ynamical updating and the views need to
serve identical
versions of the zone, then you need to arrange things so the zone is
in just one
view.
The master of a zone with no dynamical updating could reference the
same zone
file from multiple views but that is about the only case that it would
w
Can this option be used in a 'slave' config to prevent out-bound transfers?
Transfers-out 0;
The 9.9.2 ARM is ambiguous.
Thanks
John Manson
CAO/HIR/NAF Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington,
DC 20515
Desk: 202-226-4244 | TCC: 202-226-6430 |
john.man...@mail
I would like to retract this post after I had a long conversation with my
co-worker who is just back from leave.
Sorry for the bother.
From: Manson, John
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 10:54 AM
To: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org'
Subject: Named stopped loging?
Good Day
Running 9.9.2 f
2012.
Named stopped and restarted @ Fri Dec 28 10:14:31 EST 2012.
9.9.2 bug or what?
No named.conf or syslog-ng changes recently.
Using the default named logging and syslog-ng as always.
Thanks
John Manson
US House of Representatives
CAO/HIR/NAF/Data-Communications
Senior Network Communications
ption is to just send
back a "403 Forbidden".
One bit I think a little bit clever is I figured out how to
make one file be legal html and legal javascript so if I'm
not sure which it might be it doesn't matter. Now, if I
could just encode a legal image in it too! :)
now their
machine is probably infected with malware.
John
---
John Hascall, j...@iastate.edu
Team Lead, NIADS (Network Infrastructure, Authentication & Directory Services)
IT Services, The Iowa State University o
---
John Hascall, j...@iastate.edu
Team Lead, NIADS (Network Infrastructure, Authentication & Directory Services)
IT Services, The Iowa State University of Science and Technology
> On 12/4/2012 6:00 AM, John
We have found that RPZ works quite well for us.
We have 366825 names in our RPZ zone at present
and scaling thus far has been a non-issue.
John
---
John Hascall, j...@iastate.edu
Team Lead, NIADS (Network Infrastructure
XFR-style IXFR ended
John Manson
US House of Representatives
CAO/HIR/NAF/Data-Communications
Senior Network Communications Specialist
Desk: 202-226-4244
TCC: 202-226-6430
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
Thanks, Evan. That's exactly what I wanted to know. I'm already
running the statistics server, so I'd certainly prefer to leverage that
rather than rely on a bunch of regexes to parse the statistics file.
I'll let the folks at Hyperic know about the upcoming schema chan
Thank you! Just downloaded a copy, and looks pretty straightforward.
John
On 11/15/2012 12:13 PM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
Thanks, Phil. Those were my thoughts as well. For the present,
I'll write my own monitoring plugin to parse the XML data.
If you need some inspiration, I wrote a bit
Thanks, Carsten,
I've opened bug #4619 and indeed asked Hyperic to parse the XML output.
I agree, it's much nicer than trying to parse the rndc.stats file!
If anyone here has already written a BIND plugin for Hyperic, let me
know--I'd love to have a copy and see if it'll
Thanks, Phil. Those were my thoughts as well. For the present, I'll
write my own monitoring plugin to parse the XML data.
John
On 11/15/2012 11:47 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 15/11/12 16:44, John Miller wrote:
Hello everyone,
When did BIND 9 switch over from the older
I think tha
ormat, and wanted to be sure I had
my ducks in a row.
--
John Miller
Systems Engineer
Brandeis University
johnm...@brandeis.edu
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
arting
Nov 14 15:46:41 local@mercury named[2920]: [ID 873579 daemon.info] adb:
grow_names finished
Nov 14 16:01:11 local@mercury named[2920]: [ID 873579 daemon.info] adb:
grow_names to 8191 starting
Nov 14 16:01:12 local@mercury named[2920]: [ID 873579 daemon.info] adb:
grow_names finished
J
is dynamic cache-memory allocation as it increases and decreases
as needed.
Is there are ARM entry that explains this?
Thanks
John Manson
CAO/HIR/NAF Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington,
DC 20515
Desk: 202-226-4244 | TCC: 202-226-6430 | john.man...@mail.house.gov
501 - 600 of 813 matches
Mail list logo
