Re: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-08-02 Thread Danny Mayer
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 29.07.09 22:37, Abello, Vinny wrote: Considering 2003, 2003 R2, 2008, and 2008 R2 (technically done, but will officially release in October) have been released, I don't think dropping support for an ancient operating system from 9.5 years ago and roughly 3

Re: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-08-01 Thread Danny Mayer
Jukka Pakkanen wrote: Unfortunately W2K was dropped a while ago, no safe version available for it. Actually, less than a year ago. It became necessary. Danny I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side

Re: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-07-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 29.07.09 22:37, Abello, Vinny wrote: Considering 2003, 2003 R2, 2008, and 2008 R2 (technically done, but will officially release in October) have been released, I don't think dropping support for an ancient operating system from 9.5 years ago and roughly 3 prior generations that the vendor

[SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-07-29 Thread Greg
I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what version of bind will run on this? Thanks Greg This message has been checked by

Re: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-07-29 Thread Jukka Pakkanen
Unfortunately W2K was dropped a while ago, no safe version available for it. I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what