Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 29.07.09 22:37, Abello, Vinny wrote:
>> Considering 2003, 2003 R2, 2008, and 2008 R2 (technically done, but will
>> officially release in October) have been released, I don't think dropping
>> support for an ancient operating system from 9.5 years ago and roughly
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
> Unfortunately W2K was dropped a while ago, no safe version available for it.
>
Actually, less than a year ago. It became necessary.
Danny
>
>> I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop
>> for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark
On 29.07.09 22:37, Abello, Vinny wrote:
> Considering 2003, 2003 R2, 2008, and 2008 R2 (technically done, but will
> officially release in October) have been released, I don't think dropping
> support for an ancient operating system from 9.5 years ago and roughly 3
> prior generations that the vend
dea. :) 2k boxes are
time bombs, IMO.
-Vinny
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-
> boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jukka Pakkanen
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:41 PM
> To: Greg
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Sub
Unfortunately W2K was dropped a while ago, no safe version available for it.
> I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop
> for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I
> want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what
I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop
for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I
want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what version of
bind will run on this?
Thanks
Greg
This message has been checked by the
6 matches
Mail list logo