Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 29.07.09 22:37, Abello, Vinny wrote:
Considering 2003, 2003 R2, 2008, and 2008 R2 (technically done, but will
officially release in October) have been released, I don't think dropping
support for an ancient operating system from 9.5 years ago and roughly 3
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
Unfortunately W2K was dropped a while ago, no safe version available for it.
Actually, less than a year ago. It became necessary.
Danny
I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop
for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side
On 29.07.09 22:37, Abello, Vinny wrote:
Considering 2003, 2003 R2, 2008, and 2008 R2 (technically done, but will
officially release in October) have been released, I don't think dropping
support for an ancient operating system from 9.5 years ago and roughly 3
prior generations that the vendor
I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop
for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I
want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what version of
bind will run on this?
Thanks
Greg
This message has been checked by
Unfortunately W2K was dropped a while ago, no safe version available for it.
I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop
for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I
want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what
5 matches
Mail list logo