On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:44:22PM -0600, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
> Hmmm, from what I vaguely recall from my software engineering days, was
> that memcpy() didn't ever handle overlapped memory buffers and that you
> should consider memmove() in such cases.
Yes, that's correct, and in fact
Hmmm, from what I vaguely recall from my software engineering days, was
that memcpy() didn't ever handle overlapped memory buffers and that you
should consider memmove() in such cases.
Doesn't really make sense that it should, though I think I first learned
about this during a code review. Don't
Hello, Bind-Users Readers --
Since you are all subscribers to bind-announce as well [You are,
aren't you? It's where we make announcements about security
vulnerabilities and about new versions of BIND] you are probably
already aware that ISC has announced CVE-2014-0591, a vulnerability
which can
3 matches
Mail list logo
