On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, 21:57 +, Evan Hunt wrote:
> I suspect if we just remove the .py SUFFIXES rule and replace it with
> explicit rules for dnssec-checkds and dnssec-coverage, it'll work...
As far as I can see, adding the explicit dependency doesn't mean that
the .py rule _has_ to be removed (
That should be fine workaround for ports for FreeBSD and NetBSD
until bmake is fixed. Windows needs the .py extension so it isn't
a general fix.
Mark
In message <20140912215722.gb49...@isc.org>, Evan Hunt writes:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 07:50:55AM +1000, John Marshall wrote:
> > I guess we ju
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 07:50:55AM +1000, John Marshall wrote:
> I guess we just work around this until the NetBSD folks can pinpoint
> what appears to be a bmake problem.
I suspect if we just remove the .py SUFFIXES rule and replace it with
explicit rules for dnssec-checkds and dnssec-coverage, i
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, 08:58 -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> > Yes, you can't use bmake if you try to build the python bits, I had to
> > force gmake in the port:
>
> It looks to be a bug in the NetBSD bmake used by FreeBSD. I cannot find
> a bug repor
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, 23:48 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Try collapsing the multiple .SUFFIXES into a single entry.
Thanks Mark. That sounded promising! I applied your patch to a
freshly-unbundled build tree but it made no difference to bmake's
inability to find the python source files. The r
+--On 12 septembre 2014 08:58:18 -0500 "Jeremy C. Reed"
wrote:
| On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|
|> Yes, you can't use bmake if you try to build the python bits, I had to
|> force gmake in the port:
|
| It looks to be a bug in the NetBSD bmake used by FreeBSD. I cannot find
| a b
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Try collapsing the multiple .SUFFIXES into a single entry.
That doesn't work (for me).
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> It looks to be a bug in the NetBSD bmake used by FreeBSD. I cannot find
> a bug report for it in FreeBSD. I opened one for NetBSD:
> http://gnats.netbsd.org/49198x
http://gnats.netbsd.org/49198
(My system types a random "x" on its own often. Imagine
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Yes, you can't use bmake if you try to build the python bits, I had to
> force gmake in the port:
It looks to be a bug in the NetBSD bmake used by FreeBSD. I cannot find
a bug report for it in FreeBSD. I opened one for NetBSD:
http://gnats.netbsd.org/
Try collapsing the multiple .SUFFIXES into a single entry.
diff --git a/make/rules.in b/make/rules.in
index e96507e..fdc5235 100644
--- a/make/rules.in
+++ b/make/rules.in
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ BUILD_LDFLAGS = @BUILD_LDFLAGS@
BUILD_LIBS = @BUILD_LIBS@
.SUFFIXES:
-.SUFFIXES: .c .@O@
+.SUFFIXES:
+--On 12 septembre 2014 09:11:08 +1000 John Marshall
wrote:
| I can't build BIND 9.10.1rc2 on recent FreeBSD 10-STABLE.
| I have tried on both i386 and amd64 variants of the operating system.
| BIND 9.10.1rc1 builds fine, as did the beta releases.
|
| Failure looks like this:
|
| making all in
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, 19:52 +1000, John Marshall wrote:
> A FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE system is building rc2 happily: it uses pmake: but
> bmake on the 10-STABLE systems falls over with:
>
> making all in /build/bind/bind-9.10.1rc2/bin/python
> make[3]: don't know how to make dnssec-checkds. Stop
>
Yes, I think is a make problem. I reported same issue a couple weeks
ago. (Internal BUg #36993). To workaround, use gmake. We can provide a
patch very quick.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this l
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, 23:38 +, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 09:11:08AM +1000, John Marshall wrote:
> > I can't build BIND 9.10.1rc2 on recent FreeBSD 10-STABLE.
> > I have tried on both i386 and amd64 variants of the operating system.
> > BIND 9.10.1rc1 builds fine, as did the beta
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 09:11:08AM +1000, John Marshall wrote:
> I can't build BIND 9.10.1rc2 on recent FreeBSD 10-STABLE.
> I have tried on both i386 and amd64 variants of the operating system.
> BIND 9.10.1rc1 builds fine, as did the beta releases.
Based on the failure being in bin/python, I sup
I can't build BIND 9.10.1rc2 on recent FreeBSD 10-STABLE.
I have tried on both i386 and amd64 variants of the operating system.
BIND 9.10.1rc1 builds fine, as did the beta releases.
Failure looks like this:
making all in /build/bind/bind-9.10.1rc2/bin/python
make[3]: don't know how to make dn
16 matches
Mail list logo
