Christian Tardif wrote:
>
> Back to a DNS problem, I came back to this thread. If I do a "dig +norec", I
> still don't get the final answer but then, I get a whole bunch of information
> (the NS records for the requested zone, and the A records relativey to these
> NS records)
That means the loc
On 10/24/2012 11:56 AM, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Oct 23, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Christian Tardif wrote:
Hi,
I have a strange BIND behaviour I don't know how to handle. As I don't exactly
know how to describe it, I'll rather explain what I did and what happens. But
not quite easy to follow.
In my t
On Oct 23, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Christian Tardif wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange BIND behaviour I don't know how to handle. As I don't
> exactly know how to describe it, I'll rather explain what I did and what
> happens. But not quite easy to follow.
>
> In my tests, I have two servers with BIN
In article ,
Christian Tardif wrote:
> SiteA is a recursive name server. I've been able to prove that it does
> not behave correctly under certain circumstances by hitting it with a
> simple request: asking it to give me NS records for a certain subdomain
> for which it's primary for the base
Hi,
I have a strange BIND behaviour I don't know how to handle. As I don't
exactly know how to describe it, I'll rather explain what I did and what
happens. But not quite easy to follow.
In my tests, I have two servers with BIND installed on them: SiteA (BIND
9.8.2rc1 on CentOS 6.3), and Sit
5 matches
Mail list logo