BUG? Wildcard lookup masked by more specific record of alternative type

2014-02-14 Thread Terry Burton
Hi, Is the following expected or is it a bug? All the best, Terry ; This wildcard allows the lookup of test.domain A: ; *.domain IN A 1.2.3.4 ; ; This TLSA record breaks the lookup of test.domain A: ; _443._tcp.test.domain IN TLSA 1 0 1

Re: BUG? Wildcard lookup masked by more specific record of alternative type

2014-02-14 Thread Tony Finch
Terry Burton t...@terryburton.co.uk wrote: Is the following expected or is it a bug? It is correct. See RFC 4592 for the full explanation of how wildcards work. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at http://dotat.at/ Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at

Re: BUG? Wildcard lookup masked by more specific record of alternative type

2014-02-14 Thread Terry Burton
On 14 February 2014 12:01, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote: Terry Burton t...@terryburton.co.uk wrote: Is the following expected or is it a bug? It is correct. See RFC 4592 for the full explanation of how wildcards work. For sake of Google... RFC 4592 3.3.1 defines The closest encloser is the