On 4/27/19 9:22 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 4/27/19 5:33 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 27 Apr 2019, at 16:21, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Why is 9.12+ now suddenly so grumpy about who owns the files? Is this a recent
fix to reduce the attack surface on files owned by root?
Pretty sure. I thought it was
On 4/27/19 5:33 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 27 Apr 2019, at 16:21, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> Why is 9.12+ now suddenly so grumpy about who owns the files? Is this a
>> recent fix to reduce the attack surface on files owned by root?
>
> Pretty sure. I thought it was mentioned in the 9.12 release
On 27 Apr 2019, at 16:21, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> Why is 9.12+ now suddenly so grumpy about who owns the files? Is this a
> recent fix to reduce the attack surface on files owned by root?
Pretty sure. I thought it was mentioned in the 9.12 release notes, but now I
can't find it.
--
One of
On 4/27/19 3:33 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On 27/04/2019 21:52, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
>> Running: FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE #0 r345904
>>
>> Bind 9.11 works fine. If I attempt to install 9.12 or greater, the
>> installation succeeds but any attempt to start the daemon fails silently.
>>
On 27/04/2019 21:52, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Hi Tim,
> Running: FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE #0 r345904
>
> Bind 9.11 works fine. If I attempt to install 9.12 or greater, the
> installation succeeds but any attempt to start the daemon fails silently.
> Output of 'sh -x /usr/local/rc.d/named start' follows
Running: FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE #0 r345904
Bind 9.11 works fine. If I attempt to install 9.12 or greater, the
installation succeeds but any attempt to start the daemon fails silently.
Output of 'sh -x /usr/local/rc.d/named start' follows below.
Any thoughts or pointers would be deeply
6 matches
Mail list logo
