Re: Bind won't start: /etc/named.conf

2010-10-04 Thread Dotan Cohen
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:16, Imri Zvik wrote: > What does the logs say? Thanks, Imri, the logs complain about /etc/db.cache. I copied /etc/db.cache from the ns1 server to the ns2 server and bind stopped complaining. > Is the server chrooted or not? no > And I think you want to use "type slave

RE: Bind won't start: /etc/named.conf

2010-10-02 Thread Imri Zvik
bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Bind won't start: /etc/named.conf On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 23:49, Imri Zvik wrote: > What are you trying to achieve? An empty named.conf file means named will > use defaults for everything, and will probably just work out-of-the-box (as > a simple

Re: Bind won't start: /etc/named.conf

2010-09-28 Thread Dotan Cohen
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 23:49, Imri Zvik wrote: > What are you trying to achieve? An empty named.conf file means named will > use defaults for everything, and will probably just work out-of-the-box (as > a simple resolver) so you should give more information about the goal and > problem (including

RE: Bind won't start: /etc/named.conf

2010-09-28 Thread Imri Zvik
.). -Original Message- From: Dotan Cohen [mailto:dotanco...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:11 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Bind won't start: /etc/named.conf I have just installed bind on a CentOS 5 machine but it won't start without /etc/named.conf: [r...@venus

Bind won't start: /etc/named.conf

2010-09-28 Thread Dotan Cohen
I have just installed bind on a CentOS 5 machine but it won't start without /etc/named.conf: [r...@venus etc]# /etc/init.d/named start Locating //etc/named.conf failed: [FAILED] [r...@venus etc]# touch /etc/named.conf [r...@venus etc]# /et