On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 9:06:53 PM UTC-4, Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/07/2013 01:50 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 07.05.13 11:06, Michael Varre wrote:
So interestingly they did give me their setup and this is their
response, and my warm and fuzzy feeling continues to go out the
I'm setting up a new zone, similar to the many I've created successfully on
other ISPs to answer with PTR records for a /26 the ISP has sub-delegated to my
dns servers and it continues to fail:
May 7 08:18:31 dns1 named[25328]: client 1.1.1.1#62125: view external: query
(cache)
In article mailman.240.1367938655.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Michael Varre mva...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm setting up a new zone, similar to the many I've created successfully on
other ISPs to answer with PTR records for a /26 the ISP has sub-delegated to
my dns servers and it continues to
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 11:34:07 AM UTC-4, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.240.1367938655.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Michael Varre mva...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm setting up a new zone, similar to the many I've created successfully on
other ISPs to answer with PTR
I recommend dig +trace -x on one of your assigned IPs. Compare with
the result from a known-good sub-24 rev dns delegation. The ISP
should be returning something like:
162.48.168.205.in-addr.arpa. 43200 IN CNAME
162.160-175.48.168.205.in-addr.arpa.
160-175.48.168.205.in-addr.arpa. 43200 IN
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 12:04:10 PM UTC-4, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
I recommend dig +trace -x on one of your assigned IPs. Compare with
the result from a known-good sub-24 rev dns delegation. The ISP
should be returning something like:
162.48.168.205.in-addr.arpa. 43200 IN CNAME
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 12:04:10 PM UTC-4, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
I recommend dig +trace -x on one of your assigned IPs. Compare with
the result from a known-good sub-24 rev dns delegation. The ISP
should be returning something like:
162.48.168.205.in-addr.arpa. 43200 IN CNAME
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:52:16AM -0700, Michael Varre wrote:
Thanks Justin, I've been testing with dig and that's how I got the failed
results posted previously. My digs lead me to believe their zones are named
the same as mine, with -'s instead of /'s.
dig -x 1.1.1.90 +trace
and so much for keeping my ip's and hosts private :)
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
In article mailman.246.1367950255.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Justin T Pryzby justinpry...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
It appears they may have manually added NS records for each of 64 IPs.
That's messy and inelegant for them, and doesn't work right either.
The ISP is responding with NS
On 07.05.13 11:06, Michael Varre wrote:
So interestingly they did give me their setup and this is their response, and
my warm and fuzzy feeling continues to go out the window:
They use SimpleDNS
Record Name: 65.246.59.108.in-addr.arpa
DNS Server (FQDN): dns1.kishmish.com.
TTL: 1 Hour
I'd
On 05/07/2013 01:50 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 07.05.13 11:06, Michael Varre wrote:
So interestingly they did give me their setup and this is their
response, and my warm and fuzzy feeling continues to go out the window:
They use SimpleDNS
Record Name: 65.246.59.108.in-addr.arpa
DNS
12 matches
Mail list logo
