Re: DNSSEC Bogus NXDOMAIN survives authenticating RR

2010-01-25 Thread Niobos
On 2009-12-10 08:49, Niobos wrote: Thank you very much for your help; I'll forward the conversation to the bug-tracking list. Since these are my first DNSSEC experiments, I just wanted to make sure that it wasn't a problem with my understanding of the concept. Niobos This has been

Re: DNSSEC Bogus NXDOMAIN survives authenticating RR

2009-12-09 Thread Niobos
Could you try this lookup? dig +dnssec removed.dnssec.dest-unreach.be I see now what you mean. Even though I have added your DNSKEY as trusted key, I get SERVFAIL on the first query and NXDOMAIN on the second, without BIND doing any additional outgoing queries. This is the same behavior

Re: DNSSEC Bogus NXDOMAIN survives authenticating RR

2009-12-09 Thread Hauke Lampe
[I finally gave up on trying to get Thunderbird *not* to wrap long lines. Prefixing them with seems to be the only way, even if confusing] Niobos wrote: dig +dnssec removed.dnssec.dest-unreach.be Even though I have added your DNSKEY as trusted key, I get SERVFAIL on the first query and

Re: DNSSEC Bogus NXDOMAIN survives authenticating RR

2009-12-08 Thread Hauke Lampe
Niobos wrote: When requesting a lookup of removed, I get a SERVFAIL as well. However, every subsequent request for removed gets an NXDOMAIN. (dig outputs below) Flushing the caches on the RR with rndc flush causes the first request to be a SERVFAIL again. I cannot reproduce this behaviour

Re: DNSSEC Bogus NXDOMAIN survives authenticating RR

2009-12-08 Thread Hauke Lampe
Niobos wrote: As soon as I activate DLV (besides the manual SEP I entered), the removed behaviour changes: * First lookup still returns SERVFAIL * Subsequent lookups now return NXDOMAIN with the AD flag *set*! (log confirms that my domain is not in the DLV and hence is insecure) That is

DNSSEC Bogus NXDOMAIN survives authenticating RR

2009-12-07 Thread Niobos
Hi all, I'm having some problems with implementing DNSSEC with NSEC3. I'm fairly new to DNSSEC, so it is certainly possible that my understanding of the subject is causing me to miss something. Also, I'm not entirely sure this is the correct mailing list, more accurate pointers are welcome.