I'm looking for success (or failure) stories to back up my statement :)
Thank you all for replies, on and off-list. If you are interested in a
summary, I've posted it at [1].
Regards,
-JP
[1] http://dnssexy.net/538
___
Please visit
At 11 Oct 2011 13:57:38 +0100,
Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Maybe an off topic in this thread, but out of curiosity, is there any
specific reason you don't use the database as the direct source of the
zone with BIND 9's dlz or PowerDNS? In general it will be slower, and
I can't
On Oct 7 2011, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 10/07/2011 06:43 PM, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
Maybe an off topic in this thread, but out of curiosity, is there any
specific reason you don't use the database as the direct source of the
zone with BIND 9's dlz or PowerDNS? In general it will be slower,
4. Perceived second-class status of DLZ
Ack.
6. Too-tight coupling between the SQL DB and DNS
It'll be interesting to see how BIND 10 [1] handles this coupling [2]. I
haven't (yet) had the inclination to experiment, mainly because (and now
back on topic :-) DDNS is apparently not yet ready
At 06 Oct 2011 20:26:48 +0100,
Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Are you willing to share the stories of your DDNS deployments, maybe
including approximate number of zones, records, update frequencies,
etc.?
We converted all our regular DNS updating operations to use dynamic
updates in
On 10/07/2011 06:43 PM, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
Maybe an off topic in this thread, but out of curiosity, is there any
specific reason you don't use the database as the direct source of the
zone with BIND 9's dlz or PowerDNS? In general it will be slower, and
I can't speak for Chris but
1. DNSSEC
Of all of them, #1 and #6 were probably the most important.
Note that this will be less of an issue in BIND 9.9: you can set up
a DLZ master and configure a slave to do inline signing.
--
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
[ pardon the possible duplicate ]
I'm a fan of RFC 2136 Dynamic DNS and, if I think it appropriate for a
particular use case, sometimes suggest DDNS to customers. I often have
a hard time convincing people to use DDNS and am doubted regarding its
stability and/or performance.
I'm looking
On 10/06/2011 09:44 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
[ pardon the possible duplicate ]
I'm a fan of RFC 2136 Dynamic DNS and, if I think it appropriate for a
particular use case, sometimes suggest DDNS to customers. I often have
a hard time convincing people to use DDNS and am doubted regarding its
I'm rolling out DDNS in conjunction with 802.1x/Mac authentication. When we
role out network authentication in a building, I use IP address pools for the
auth and unauth networks.
Auth network also uses DDNS to fwd/reverse register the host in an appropriate
domain e.g.
On Oct 6 2011, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
[ pardon the possible duplicate ]
I'm a fan of RFC 2136 Dynamic DNS and, if I think it appropriate for a
particular use case, sometimes suggest DDNS to customers. I often have
a hard time convincing people to use DDNS and am doubted regarding its
11 matches
Mail list logo
