On 04/03/2013 05:30 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
It's still not clear to me what you think is the "right" way to do it.
I'm not saying that there is only one right way. I'm saying you first
have to answer the question, "What might we want to achieve by having
different answers internally vs. extern
On 4/2/2013 2:00 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 04/01/2013 11:46 AM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 3/29/2013 12:09 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2013 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote:
My organization is evaluating the use of split-view DNS in our
environment.
Simple ... don't do it. It's almost n
On 04/01/2013 11:46 AM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 3/29/2013 12:09 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2013 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote:
My organization is evaluating the use of split-view DNS in our
environment.
Simple ... don't do it. It's almost never the right answer, and as
you're lear
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Darcy
Date: Monday, April 1, 2013 2:46 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: Forward First on Master Zone (bypass SOA)
>On 3/29/2013 12:09 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 03/28/2013 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote:
>
On 3/29/2013 12:09 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2013 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote:
My organization is evaluating the use of split-view DNS in our
environment.
Simple ... don't do it. It's almost never the right answer, and as
you're learning carries with it more administrative ov
On 3/29/2013 6:12 PM, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
- Original Message -
On Mar 28, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote:
I’ve spent hours researching a way to accomplish this without any
luck. Is there any way to accomplish what I’m trying to do?
No, not unless you want
- Original Message -
> On Mar 28, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote:
>
> > I’ve spent hours researching a way to accomplish this without any
> > luck. Is there any way to accomplish what I’m trying to do?
>
> No, not unless you want to monkey around with static zones and
>
On Mar 28, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote:
I've spent hours researching a way to accomplish this without any luck.
Is there any way to accomplish what I'm trying to do?
No, not unless you want to monkey around with static zones and $INCLUDE
directives -- something like this:
On 03/28/2013 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote:
My organization is evaluating the use of split-view DNS in our environment.
Simple ... don't do it. It's almost never the right answer, and as
you're learning carries with it more administrative overhead than the
problems it's designed to
On 3/28/2013 3:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote:
Hello,
My organization is evaluating the use of split-view DNS in our
environment.
One of the challenges I've yet to overcome in my trials, is the
ability to minimize the administrative overhead of maintaining two
copies of the zone.
Up
st on Master Zone (bypass SOA)
On Mar 28, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote:
> I've spent hours researching a way to accomplish this without any luck. Is
> there any way to accomplish what I'm trying to do?
No, not unless you want to monkey around with static zones and
On Mar 28, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote:
> I’ve spent hours researching a way to accomplish this without any luck. Is
> there any way to accomplish what I’m trying to do?
No, not unless you want to monkey around with static zones and $INCLUDE
directives -- something like this
A server will not forward a zone it is also authoritative for.
On Mar 28, 2013 3:33 PM, "Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS)" <
tal.ben-elie...@its.ny.gov> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ** **
>
> My organization is evaluating the use of split-view DNS in our environment.
>
>
> One of the challenges I’ve yet to
Hello,
My organization is evaluating the use of split-view DNS in our environment.
One of the challenges I've yet to overcome in my trials, is the ability to
minimize the administrative overhead of maintaining two copies of the zone.
Upon reviewing some of the BIND options, "forward first;" caugh
14 matches
Mail list logo
