Re: Forwarded lookup failing on no valid RRSIG

2020-12-23 Thread Nicolas Bock
On Sun, Dec 20 2020, Mark Andrews wrote: >> On 21 Dec 2020, at 06:04, Matthew Pounsett wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 18:08, Nicolas Bock >> wrote: >> Thanks Mark. Am I correct then that I need to either convince the >> administrator of that DNS to enable DNSSEC or configure my

Re: Forwarded lookup failing on no valid RRSIG

2020-12-20 Thread Mark Andrews
> On 21 Dec 2020, at 06:04, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > > > On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 18:08, Nicolas Bock wrote: > Thanks Mark. Am I correct then that I need to either convince the > administrator of that DNS to enable DNSSEC or configure my DNS with > `dnssec-validation = no`? > > The upstr

Re: Forwarded lookup failing on no valid RRSIG

2020-12-20 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 18:08, Nicolas Bock wrote: > Thanks Mark. Am I correct then that I need to either convince the > administrator of that DNS to enable DNSSEC or configure my DNS with > `dnssec-validation = no`? > The upstream administrator isn't required to be validating DNSSEC for this to

Re: Forwarded lookup failing on no valid RRSIG

2020-12-18 Thread Nicolas Bock
Thanks Mark. Am I correct then that I need to either convince the administrator of that DNS to enable DNSSEC or configure my DNS with `dnssec-validation = no`? Thanks, Nick On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 3:07 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > Correct it is not validating. Additionally it isn’t even DNSSES aw

Re: Forwarded lookup failing on no valid RRSIG

2020-12-18 Thread Mark Andrews
Correct it is not validating. Additionally it isn’t even DNSSES aware. It will need to be updated for you to validate through it. -- Mark Andrews > On 19 Dec 2020, at 05:07, Nicolas Bock wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > Thanks so much for the reply. I ran this command and am > getting the following

Re: Forwarded lookup failing on no valid RRSIG

2020-12-18 Thread @lbutlr
On 18 Dec 2020, at 10:56, Nicolas Bock wrote: > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > com. 63779 IN DS 30909 8 2 > E2D3C916F6DEEAC73294E8268FB5885044A833FC5459588F4A9184CF C41A5766 > In other words, the forwarder returns a Delegation Signer > record but not an RRset Signature record. Presumably that > means that

Re: Forwarded lookup failing on no valid RRSIG

2020-12-18 Thread Nicolas Bock
Hi Mark, Thanks so much for the reply. I ran this command and am getting the following: $ dig +dnssec ds com @10.0.0.3 ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> +dnssec ds com @10.0.0.3 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36260 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, AN

Re: Forwarded lookup failing on no valid RRSIG

2020-12-17 Thread Mark Andrews
DNSSEC requires that forwarders support DNSSEC. Check that the forwarders return DNSSEC records when they are queried. The forwarders should also be validating to filter spoofed responses from the internet. You should be getting a answer like this if the forwarders are validating. [beetle:~]

Forwarded lookup failing on no valid RRSIG

2020-12-17 Thread Nicolas Bock
Hi, When I configure my named to forward to our corporate DNS servers (10.0.0.2 and 10.0.0.3), I end up getting error messages such as Dec 17 20:58:06 dns-server named[843946]: fetch: www.canonical.com/A Dec 17 20:58:06 dns-server named[843946]: fetch: com/DS Dec 17 20:58:06