.
- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Nicholas Miller
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 4:16 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: GSS-TSIG update-policy clarification
Thats well and good for an organization that controls
Thats well and good for an organization that controls ALL of the end points. In
a university that isn’t possible.
_
Nicholas Miller, OIT, University of Colorado at Boulder
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 2:04 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> If you don’
If you don’t want 6to4 addresses stop the machine configuring them.
Not everything should be done at the DNS level.
--
Mark Andrews
> On 24 Mar 2018, at 01:07, Nicholas Miller
> wrote:
>
> As a followup, is there a way to stop Windows systems from adding their
> 6-to-4 record? I see li
As a followup, is there a way to stop Windows systems from adding their 6-to-4
record? I see little point in adding these records to a domain.
_
Nicholas Miller, OIT, University of Colorado at Boulder
> On Mar 22, 2018, at 12:13 PM, Mar
This was noted in the release notes and in CHANGES.
4885. [security] update-policy rules that otherwise ignore the name
field now require that it be set to "." to ensure
that any type list present is properly interpreted.
With the latest update to bind our named.conf started reporting errors. I have
figured it out but wanted to get clarification about the syntax.
We had been using:
deny DOMAIN.EDU krb5-subdomain DOMAIN.EDU CNAME MX SRV TXT;
We are now using:
deny DOMAIN.EDU krb5-subdomain . CNAM
6 matches
Mail list logo
