How may NS entries typically is allowed per zone? Is there a bind
limit or does it cause any side effects if the
slaves are geographically distributed ?
We would like to setup one zone for my new group who have offices all
over the world ? We are planning
to use BIND 9 over FreeBSD. There may be
I have never heard of there being any downside to a large number of NS
records for a domain.
I know internally to my company we have large numbers of NS records for the
internal domains.
--
-Ben Croswell
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:51 PM, shulkae shul...@gmail.com wrote:
How may NS entries
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 04:51:52PM -0800,
shulkae shul...@gmail.com wrote
a message of 17 lines which said:
How may NS entries typically is allowed per zone?
The protocol has no limit. But you may run into problems with old
software which still limits the DNS packets to 512 bytes. See all
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:25:35PM -0600,
bsfin...@anl.gov bsfin...@anl.gov wrote
a message of 41 lines which said:
One downside - if you have many NS records, then they might not all
fit in one UDP packet
Let me demonstrate a bit of pedantism: the correct sentence is rather
they might not
In article gm7ksm$198...@sf1.isc.org, bsfin...@anl.gov wrote:
One downside - if you have many NS records, then they might not all
fit in one UDP packet (the Authority and/or Addition sections of a
response to a DNS query). This will cause the protocol to revert
to TCP.
Truncation isn't
5 matches
Mail list logo