Hello Phil,
Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk writes:
On 10/24/2012 10:17 PM, Carsten Strotmann wrote:
my experience is that it is safe to place clients in either a DNS domain
with the same name as the AD domain, or in a subdomain of the AD
domain.
What does place mean, exactly?
I don't disagree that broadcast netbios probably should be disabled
(though it's not at our site, for historical reasons, and I'm not
sure I'm willing to take on the monumental task of disabling it).
WINS is slightly different, and the main reason to disable it is
that it hides
On 10/27/2012 04:28 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
I don't disagree that broadcast netbios probably should be disabled
(though it's not at our site, for historical reasons, and I'm not
sure I'm willing to take on the monumental task of disabling it).
WINS is slightly different, and the main reason
On 10/25/2012 08:44 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 10/24/2012 6:02 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
Hell, if you've got WINS running and broadcast netbios, I think it's
still possible to log in with *no* working DNS at all.
At the risk of getting *totally* off-topic, no-one who cares about
security or
On 10/24/2012 9:50 AM, Nicholas F Miller wrote:
On Oct 24, 2012, at 7:12 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
We use Bind for all DNS including DDNS for our AD. We use GSS-TSIG to
control what record types and machines can make dynamic updates to our AD
zone. We use ISC's DHCP but don't allow it
On Oct 24, 2012, at 6:50 AM, Nicholas F Miller wrote:
Scavenging is a concern but we didn't have much choice. Our AD is only one of
many subdomains and our DHCP spans all of them. If we used DHCP for DDNS
records we wouldn't be guaranteed unique names. By limiting DDNS to just the
AD we are
On 24/10/12 16:54, Kevin Darcy wrote:
Why do you feel the need to register clients in your AD domain at all?
We register our clients outside of the AD domain via the DHCP server;
Our experience is that this can cause (minor) problems.
The basic issue is that, if you have an AD realm:
Hello Aaron,
Aaron Thompson athomp...@berklee.edu writes:
I have little experience in the AD arena for DNS/DHCP. Without being
a too loaded question, with your experience is it possible or common
to have a very knowledgeable understanding of the performance and
health of an AD system
Hello Phil,
Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk writes:
Our experience is that this can cause (minor) problems.
The basic issue is that, if you have an AD realm:
EXAMPLE.COM
...and a machine:
foo
...then windows tries very hard to stick its fingers in its ears,
shout la la I am not
On 10/24/2012 10:17 PM, Carsten Strotmann wrote:
my experience is that it is safe to place clients in either a DNS domain
with the same name as the AD domain, or in a subdomain of the AD
domain.
What does place mean, exactly?
Bear in mind that, unfortunately, Microsoft chose to embed DNS
and the input on the survey!
Survey Request: Active Directory with ISC Bind and DHCPD
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2VYNKW
Aaron
-
Aaron Thompson
Network Architect for IT Operations
Berklee College of Music
1140 Boylston Street, MS-186-NETT
Boston, MA 02215-3693
www.berklee.edu
617.747.8656
Michael, much appreciation for the feed back from our west coast Berkeley!
You wouldn't know or have a copy of that Gartner paper would you??
Best,
Aaron
-
Aaron Thompson
Network Architect for IT Operations
Berklee College of Music
1140 Boylston Street, MS-186-NETT
Boston, MA
Nicholas,
Are you using AD or Bind for DNS/DHCP? I'm assuming your using AD for
authentication.
Thanks for the feed back and input on the survey!
Survey Request: Active Directory with ISC Bind and DHCPD
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2VYNKW
-
Aaron Thompson
Network Architect for IT Operations
Hi Carsten,
Thanks for the feedback, a top notch summary!
I have little experience in the AD arena for DNS/DHCP. Without being a too
loaded question, with your experience is it possible or common to have a very
knowledgeable understanding of the performance and health of an AD system
similar
Request: Active Directory with ISC Bind and DHCPD
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2VYNKW
-
Aaron Thompson
Network Architect for IT Operations
Berklee College of Music
1140 Boylston Street, MS-186-NETT
Boston, MA 02215-3693
www.berklee.edu
617.747.8656
Twitter: @thomp318
Hello Aaron,
Aaron Thompson athomp...@berklee.edu writes:
I'm hopping to get some feedback from people who use ISC Bind and
DHCPD in Active Directory environments.
[...]
If you have any relevant feed back I would appreciate it. I'm looking
for information on experience with Active
On 10/18/2012 3:17 PM, bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org wrote:
Hi All,
I'm hopping to get some feedback from people who use ISC Bind and DHCPD in
Active Directory environments.
Currently we use Bind/DHCPD for dynamic DNS and DHCP. It's been a pretty
stable service, redundant and we are
DDNS record scavenging is the only feature I'm aware of that MS DNS has that
Bind doesn't . On the flip side, ISC Bind can ACL who can add certain record
types to a dynamic zone using GSS-TSIG as well as supports views and ACLs for
recursion. Everything else should be standard DNS.
Nicholas F Miller nicholas.mil...@colorado.edu wrote:
DDNS record scavenging is the only feature I'm aware of that MS DNS has
that Bind doesn't . On the flip side, ISC Bind can ACL who can add
certain record types to a dynamic zone using GSS-TSIG as well as
supports views and ACLs for recursion.
On Oct 19, 2012, at 13.27, Phil Mayers wrote:
Nicholas F Miller nicholas.mil...@colorado.edu wrote:
DDNS record scavenging is the only feature I'm aware of that MS DNS has
that Bind doesn't . On the flip side, ISC Bind can ACL who can add
certain record types to a dynamic zone using
Hi All,
I'm hopping to get some feedback from people who use ISC Bind and DHCPD in
Active Directory environments.
Currently we use Bind/DHCPD for dynamic DNS and DHCP. It's been a pretty
stable service, redundant and we are polling statistics with Cacti. There is
concern by Management of
You should think of DNS hosting, DNS resolution and DHCP, as separate
services that can either be put together on a single platform, or run on
separate platforms in various combinations, interoperating with each
other. Another important factor is whether your AD domain is colocated
with a
On 10/18/12 11:03 AM, Aaron Thompson wrote:
Hi All,
I'm hopping to get some feedback from people who use ISC Bind and DHCPD
in Active Directory environments.
Currently we use Bind/DHCPD for dynamic DNS and DHCP. It's been a
pretty stable service, redundant and we are polling statistics
Hi there,
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org wrote:
ISC Bind in Active Directory (Aaron Thompson)
I'm hopping
Sometimes AD has that effect. :)
to get some feedback from people who use ISC Bind and DHCPD in
Active Directory environments.
I've been working on a client's
24 matches
Mail list logo
