Thanks All!
I upgraded to 9.6 and the slowness issue seems to of disappeared! This is
a good thing anyway since I wanted to test out some of the new xml stats
features. Thanks to all who have replied.
>
> Upgrade:
> 1773. [bug] Fast retry on host / net unreachable. [RT #13
Upgrade:
1773. [bug] Fast retry on host / net unreachable. [RT #13153]
In message <20522.170.149.100.10.1230669064.squir...@from525.com>, "David Porsc
he'" writes:
> All,
>
> I have installed a caching only instance of BIND (9.2.4) on a CentOS
> machine on my internal network. I hav
We had a similar problem when we moved some DNS servers to a DMZ that was
behind a firewall (a Cisco FWSM blade in a 6513 chassis.) A packet capture
showed that the initial query from the DNS server had the EDNS flag set. It
never got a response to that query, and would then resend it without the
In article ,
David Porsche' wrote:
>All,
>
>I have installed a caching only instance of BIND (9.2.4) on a CentOS
>machine on my internal network. I have noticed that initial DNS requests
>against the server take a rather large amount of time (usually around 7
>seconds). I have done some basic t
FYI,
Here is the snoop data I forgot to post before.
**NOTE** This snoop data is from a different lookup than the BIND debug
data I posted earlier. If expanded snoop data is needed to help
troubleshoot please let me know and I will be happy to provide it.
Snoop Data
No. Time
All,
I have installed a caching only instance of BIND (9.2.4) on a CentOS
machine on my internal network. I have noticed that initial DNS requests
against the server take a rather large amount of time (usually around 7
seconds). I have done some basic troubleshooting and I am coming up at a
loss
6 matches
Mail list logo
