Thank you, Bob.
Unfortunately, records are generated by my users, not by me, so I can't change
them as I want.
Thanks again for your time and detailed explanation.
Andrey.
24.10.2019, 19:53, "Bob Harold" :
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:20 AM Andrey Geyn wrote:
>> Hi, Bob, thank you for respons
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:20 AM Andrey Geyn wrote:
> Hi, Bob, thank you for response!
>
> What if I want to make following configuration (as an example):
>
> domain.comA10.10.10.10
> *.domain.com CNAMEdomain.com
>
> I don't want to write 10.10.10.10 twice, I want to use magic of CNAM
Hi, Bob, thank you for response! What if I want to make following configuration (as an example): domain.com A 10.10.10.10*.domain.com CNAME domain.com I don't want to write 10.10.10.10 twice, I want to use magic of CNAME's here. > Do you want cname.domain.com to point to 10.10.10.10? The
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:34 AM Andrey Geyn wrote:
> Hello, I would like to set up RPZ with CNAME and A. There are two options:
>
> 1.
> cname.domain.comCNAME test.domain.com(without trailing dot)
> test.domain.com A 10.10.10.10
>
There is a misunderstanding here. Y
I enabled debug and query logs for BIND and no, it's not look like caching
problems...
Do you have any idea how to force BIND look for CNAMEd name in RPZ?
I tried to analyze source codes, and it seems that this line prohibits to apply
policy on the second iteration:
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-
Eh? I don't understand this. Response Policy Zones are /zones/, as the
nomenclature implies: they are maintained, transferred, managed with zone
handling machinery.
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, julien soula wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:21:08PM +0500, Andrey Geyn wrote:
In my test (I have BIND
Hello...
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, Andrey Geyn wrote:
[...]
I don't understand why your tests for "cname.example.com" and
"cname.test.m3047.net" differ
(first one returns only
CNAME.EXAMPLE.COM. 5 IN CNAME TEST.EXAMPLE.COM.
I didn't understand this as well. Is it something about caching perhaps?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:21:08PM +0500, Andrey Geyn wrote:
> Hi, Fred!
>
> Thank for your reply and tests.
> The questions you ask are my questions too, just asked more professionally.
> Thanks for it :)
>
> .../...
> In my test (I have BIND 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.9-Ubuntu) I have following named.c
> getting. Oddly enough dig is giving me the unexpected results, and
> (Python) socket.getaddrinfo() does what I expect. It appears that CNAME
> resolution within RPZ is escaping...
>
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, Andrey Geyn wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:34:39
Andrey Geyn
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Internal CNAME in RPZ
Hello, I would like to set up RPZ with CNAME and A. There are two options:
1.
cname.domain.com CNAME test.domain.com (without trailing dot)
test.domain.com A 10.10.10.10
Tr
// Sorry for HTML embedded to my first email.
Hello, I would like to set up RPZ with CNAME and A. There are two options:
1.
cname.domain.comCNAME test.domain.com(without trailing dot)
test.domain.com A 10.10.10.10
In this case I receive
# dig cname.domain.com @12
Hello, I would like to set up RPZ with CNAME and A. There are two options: 1.cname.domain.com CNAME test.domain.com (without trailing dot)test.domain.com A 10.10.10.10 In this case I receive # dig cname.domain.com @127.0.0.1...cname.domain.com. 5 IN CNAME
12 matches
Mail list logo
