On 2019-01-17 08:03, Fumiya Obatake wrote:
Thank you for your reply.
Since it seems very difficult to realize, I will consider other solutions.
The obvious solution would be to use TCP.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-user
Thank you for your reply.
Since it seems very difficult to realize, I will consider other solutions.
Sincerely,
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.is
plans to do so.
s/named/nsupdate/
> --
> Mark Andrews
>
>> On 17 Jan 2019, at 00:14, Fumiya Obatake wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to use nsupdate with edns0?
>>
>> Hello, all.
>> I have some questions about nsupdate.
>>
>> I try to update a set of
TCP
still needs to be supported on the server anyway there really is no point in
trying.
Named does not attempt to send larger than 512 byte updates via UDP. There are
no plans to do so.
--
Mark Andrews
> On 17 Jan 2019, at 00:14, Fumiya Obatake wrote:
>
> Is it possible to use
Is it possible to use nsupdate with edns0?
Hello, all.
I have some questions about nsupdate.
I try to update a set of TXT records over 512 bytes in all by using
nsupdate without -v option, and it makes TCP connection automatically.
In RFC2136, `An update transaction may be carried in a UDP
5 matches
Mail list logo