Re: Is it possible to use nsupdate with EDNS0?

2019-01-17 Thread Dave Warren
On 2019-01-17 08:03, Fumiya Obatake wrote: Thank you for your reply. Since it seems very difficult to realize, I will consider other solutions. The obvious solution would be to use TCP. ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-user

Re: Is it possible to use nsupdate with EDNS0?

2019-01-17 Thread Fumiya Obatake
Thank you for your reply. Since it seems very difficult to realize, I will consider other solutions. Sincerely, ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.is

Re: Is it possible to use nsupdate with EDNS0?

2019-01-16 Thread Mark Andrews
plans to do so. s/named/nsupdate/ > -- > Mark Andrews > >> On 17 Jan 2019, at 00:14, Fumiya Obatake wrote: >> >> Is it possible to use nsupdate with edns0? >> >> Hello, all. >> I have some questions about nsupdate. >> >> I try to update a set of

Re: Is it possible to use nsupdate with EDNS0?

2019-01-16 Thread Mark Andrews
TCP still needs to be supported on the server anyway there really is no point in trying. Named does not attempt to send larger than 512 byte updates via UDP. There are no plans to do so. -- Mark Andrews > On 17 Jan 2019, at 00:14, Fumiya Obatake wrote: > > Is it possible to use

Is it possible to use nsupdate with EDNS0?

2019-01-16 Thread Fumiya Obatake
Is it possible to use nsupdate with edns0? Hello, all. I have some questions about nsupdate. I try to update a set of TXT records over 512 bytes in all by using nsupdate without -v option, and it makes TCP connection automatically. In RFC2136, `An update transaction may be carried in a UDP