In article ,
cmad...@hiwaay.net (Chris Adams) wrote:
> Once upon a time, Mark Andrews said:
> > I've raised a ticket with our ops people.
>
> While you are at it, could you see about fixing the Usenet threading?
> It appears messages from the mail-to-news gateway get the Message-ID:
> chan
In message <_aednq2trrolj9runz2dnuvz_tlin...@posted.hiwaay2>, Chris Adams write
s:
> Once upon a time, Mark Andrews said:
> > I've raised a ticket with our ops people.
>
> While you are at it, could you see about fixing the Usenet threading?
> It appears messages from the mail-to-news gatew
Once upon a time, Mark Andrews said:
> I've raised a ticket with our ops people.
While you are at it, could you see about fixing the Usenet threading?
It appears messages from the mail-to-news gateway get the Message-ID:
changed (often a bad idea) BUT the gateway doesn't update the
Referen
In message , Sam Wilson wri
tes:
> In article ,
> Chris Buxton wrote:
>
> > On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > > The old mail-to-news gateway either got this right or
> > > extracted the plain text alternative before forwarding.
> >
> > The old mail server stripped message
In article ,
Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > The old mail-to-news gateway either got this right or
> > extracted the plain text alternative before forwarding.
>
> The old mail server stripped messages down to their plaintext values.
> The new one
In article , sch...@adi.com (Thomas Schulz)
wrote:
> I was wondering what was going on. Some messages are just base64 and are
> completely useless/unreadable.
If you have mimencode you could try this:
$ mimencode -u > /tmp/weird ; less /tmp/weird
On Mac OS X and other systems with the right
On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
The old mail-to-news gateway either got this right or
extracted the plain text alternative before forwarding.
The old mail server stripped messages down to their plaintext values.
The new one does not - it allows both formatted text and atta
In article ,
Sam Wilson wrote:
>In article ,
> Barry Margolin wrote:
>
>> Does anyone still read this list via the comp.protocols.dns.bind Usenet
>> gateway? I do, and ever since the web site and mailing list revamp last
>> month, it has been a real PITA. About 1/3 of the messages in the gro
In article ,
Barry Margolin wrote:
> Does anyone still read this list via the comp.protocols.dns.bind Usenet
> gateway? I do, and ever since the web site and mailing list revamp last
> month, it has been a real PITA. About 1/3 of the messages in the group
> have all sorts of MIME garbage in
Does anyone still read this list via the comp.protocols.dns.bind Usenet
gateway? I do, and ever since the web site and mailing list revamp last
month, it has been a real PITA. About 1/3 of the messages in the group
have all sorts of MIME garbage in the body of the messages. The problem
appea
10 matches
Mail list logo
