On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Jim k0...@arrl.net wrote:
While testing our DNSSEC signing product, I found that the expense of
signing with NSEC3 versus NSEC was very data dependent. In TLD type
zones with a sparse number of records that needed to be signed,
signing time could be reduced
In message fa2e1350901031122w75768929h3b17e0a47b806...@mail.gmail.com,
Jonathan Petersson
writes:
Hi all,
Hopefully this post wont cause as much SPAM as my last one. About a
year ago I started looking into DNSSEC and how to work with it for
dynamic updates etc. Since only NSEC was
Thanks for your input
/Jonathan
On Jan 3, 2009, at 16:13, Mark Andrews mark_andr...@isc.org wrote:
In message
fa2e1350901031122w75768929h3b17e0a47b806...@mail.gmail.com,
Jonathan Petersson
writes:
Hi all,
Hopefully this post wont cause as much SPAM as my last one. About a
year ago I
3 matches
Mail list logo
