Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-22 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 21/03/2012 09:41, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: maybe the admin set that up to force local servers using random ports, instead of 53, for outgoing requests. Nobody should use port 53 for _ougtoing_ requests. On 21.03.12 23:41, Anand Buddhdev wrote: You're wrong. A name server can use any

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-22 Thread babu dheen
: Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:46 PM Subject: Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain On 21/03/2012 09:41, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: maybe the admin set that up to force local servers using random ports, instead of 53, for outgoing requests. Nobody should use port 53 for _ougtoing_ requests

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-21 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 21.03.12 09:23, Mark Andrews wrote: Stupid firewall rules in front of the nameservers. They block traffic sent from port 53 which is the port lots of nameservers used to send query traffic. When will firewall administrators learn that the source ports can be anything, that they are not

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-21 Thread babu dheen
March 2012 11:41 AM Subject: Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain On 21.03.12 09:23, Mark Andrews wrote: Stupid firewall rules in front of the nameservers.  They block traffic sent from port 53 which is the port lots of nameservers used to send query traffic.  When will firewall

RE: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-21 Thread Lightner, Jeff
-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of babu dheen Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:14 PM To: Matus UHLAR - fantomas; bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain Dear All, When i executed #dig www.dubaiairport.comhttp://www.dubaiairport.com, i am

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-21 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 21/03/2012 09:41, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: maybe the admin set that up to force local servers using random ports, instead of 53, for outgoing requests. Nobody should use port 53 for _ougtoing_ requests. You're wrong. A name server can use any source port from 1 up to 65535 for an

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-21 Thread Mark Andrews
+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of babu dheen Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:14 PM To: Matus UHLAR - fantomas; bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain Dear All, When i executed #dig www.dubaiairport.comhttp://www.dubaiairport.com, i am

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-20 Thread babu dheen
www.dubaiairport.com NS.   Regards Papdheen M From: Michael Sinatra mich...@rancid.berkeley.edu To: babu dheen babudh...@yahoo.co.in Cc: Bind Users Mailing List bind-users@lists.isc.org Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 11:43 PM Subject: Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-20 Thread babu dheen
@lists.isc.org Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 11:47 PM Subject: Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain On 19/03/2012 21:28, babu dheen wrote: Babu, Dear Support,   I am trying to resolve www.dubaiairport.com from my GW BIND server as below. But not getting any output     $ dig

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-20 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
*From:* Anand Buddhdev ana...@ripe.net *To:* babu dheen babudh...@yahoo.co.in *Cc:* Bind Users Mailing List bind-users@lists.isc.org *Sent:* Monday, 19 March 2012 11:47 PM *Subject:* Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain On 19/03/2012 21:28, babu dheen wrote: Babu

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-20 Thread Mark Andrews
-users@lists.isc.org *Sent:* Monday, 19 March 2012 11:47 PM *Subject:* Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain On 19/03/2012 21:28, babu dheen wrote: Babu, Dear Support, I am trying to resolve www.dubaiairport.com from my GW BIND server as below. But not getting any

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-20 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 21/03/2012 00:23, Mark Andrews wrote: dig -b 0.0.0.0#53www.dubaiairport.com @svr-b003.dubaiairport.com well i do hope they will change it cause it's really a pain to see that. glad the mystery was found. Regards, Eliezer -- Eliezer Croitoru https://www1.ngtech.co.il IT consulting for

Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-19 Thread babu dheen
Dear Support,    I am trying to resolve www.dubaiairport.com from my GW BIND server as below. But not getting any output    $ dig A www.dubaiairport.com ; DiG 9.3.4-P1 A www.dubaiairport.com ;; global options:  printcmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached   Whereas, when i try

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-19 Thread Michael Sinatra
On 03/19/12 13:28, babu dheen wrote: Dear Support, I am trying to resolve www.dubaiairport.com http://www.dubaiairport.com from my GW BIND server as below. But not getting any output $ dig A www.dubaiairport.com http://www.dubaiairport.com ; DiG 9.3.4-P1 A www.dubaiairport.com

Re: Name Resolution issue with one domain

2012-03-19 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 19/03/2012 21:28, babu dheen wrote: Babu, Dear Support, I am trying to resolve www.dubaiairport.com from my GW BIND server as below. But not getting any output $ dig A www.dubaiairport.com ; DiG 9.3.4-P1 A www.dubaiairport.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; connection timed

Re: Name resolution issue on one domain

2012-01-13 Thread babu dheen
Dear Lyle,   Yes you are correct. problem with my side. I took care by removing this domain from sinkhole.   Regards Babu --- On Fri, 13/1/12, Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote: From: Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net Subject: Re: Name resolution issue on one domain To: bind-users

Name resolution issue on one domain

2012-01-12 Thread babu dheen
Dear,    We have two gateway DNS server running in BIND. One DNS is using one ISP link and another DNS server is using another ISP link.   Today i tried to resolve below URL from one DNS its not working whereas the same lookup is working fine another DNS.   Non-authoritative answer: Name:   

Re: Name resolution issue on one domain

2012-01-12 Thread babu dheen
- fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote: From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk Subject: Re: Name resolution issue on one domain To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Date: Thursday, 12 January, 2012, 4:00 PM On 12.01.12 15:37, babu dheen wrote:  We have two gateway DNS server running in BIND. One

Re: Name resolution issue on one domain

2012-01-12 Thread Lyle Giese
localhost_resolver: query: fpdns.googlecode.com IN A + */ Regards babu --- On *Thu, 12/1/12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas /uh...@fantomas.sk/* wrote: From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk Subject: Re: Name resolution issue on one domain To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Date: Thursday, 12

Re: Name resolution issue on one domain

2012-01-12 Thread babu dheen
resolution issue on one domain To: Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Date: Friday, 13 January, 2012, 1:05 AM I am going to 'assume' that you also did a dig query against the other three google.com servers and they all answered satisfactorily.  But if you did not, you need to query ns3 ns4, you already got

Re: Name resolution issue on one domain

2012-01-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 1326431703.18837.yahoomailclas...@web137306.mail.in.yahoo.com, bab u dheen writes: Yes i did for ns1, ns2, ns3 ns4 as well. But when i do dig @127.0.0.1 i am not getting any result. Below is the output First of all you *are* getting a result. If you had told people that you were