Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread John Horne
Hello, Using BIND 9.5.1 it seems that the nslookup command is not showing the TTL value of found records. It makes no difference if I set 'debug' or 'd2'. Example: == nslookup set debug www.plymouth.ac.uk Server: 127.0.0.1

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Adam Tkac
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote: Hello, Hi, Using BIND 9.5.1 it seems that the nslookup command is not showing the TTL value of found records. It makes no difference if I set 'debug' or 'd2'. Example:

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread John Horne
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote: How can I see the TTL value using nslookup? I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is far more better tool for getting such information: I agree,

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Kevin Darcy
John Horne wrote: On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote: How can I see the TTL value using nslookup? I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is far more better tool for getting

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Sam Wilson
In article mailman.715.1255626934.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote: (Fortunately nslookup's whole won't do a lookup because I can't reverse-resolve my resolver bogosity isn't really an issue at Chrysler, since we maintain proper reverse mappings, but

RE: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
You can do an ipconfig /displaydns to see some TTL info. Frank -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of John Horne Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 3:07 AM To: Bind users Subject: Nslookup not showng TTL Hello

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread John Horne
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:15 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote: Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING and BURYING it. Forever. So why does the ISC still distribute it? (Although I guess the answer may simply be because people still use it.) Don't get me wrong here -

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On 15-Oct-2009, at 16:03, John Horne wrote: On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:15 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote: Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING and BURYING it. Forever. So why does the ISC still distribute it? (Although I guess the answer may simply be because

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 76d7097b-28a4-4bbb-a2c8-05bf5b822...@conundrum.com, Matthew Pounse tt writes: On 15-Oct-2009, at 16:03, John Horne wrote: On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:15 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote: Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING and BURYING it. Forever.

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Doug Barton
Kevin Darcy wrote: John Horne wrote: On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote: How can I see the TTL value using nslookup? I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is far more