Re: Possible spnego licensing problem

2015-02-02 Thread Tony Finch
Mukund Sivaraman m...@isc.org wrote: That doesn't exactly mean general public, so does anyone else know where a license grant to implementors is documented? Section 4 of http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/IETF-TLP-3.htm Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at http://dotat.at/ Cromarty,

Possible spnego licensing problem

2015-02-02 Thread israel shahak
The file spnego.asn1 in lib/dns appears to be non-free. It says to look at RFC 4178 for the full legal notice and RFC 4178 is under a non-free license. The file spnego.asn1 is also used to generate other files. ___ Please visit

Re: Possible spnego licensing problem

2015-02-02 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
Hi Israel On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:05:43AM -0500, israel shahak wrote: The file spnego.asn1 in lib/dns appears to be non-free. It says to look at RFC 4178 for the full legal notice and RFC 4178 is under a non-free license. The file spnego.asn1 is also used to generate other files. The

Re: Possible spnego licensing problem

2015-02-02 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:07:11PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: The contents of the file are taken (adapted) from here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4178#page-16 IETF has published RFC 3978 about IETF Rights in Contributions: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3978 RFC 3978 is obsoleted by