Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-09 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 06:32, Tony Finch wrote: > > Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > > > RFC2606 reserves test, example, invalid, and localhost, for "testing > > and documentation," > > However you must either disable validation or set up your own root zone to > use them. [ RFC 6761 has more details th

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-09 Thread Tony Finch
Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > RFC2606 reserves test, example, invalid, and localhost, for "testing > and documentation," However you must either disable validation or set up your own root zone to use them. [ RFC 6761 has more details than RCF 2606 about how to use these names. ] Tony. -- f.anthon

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 14:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > I don't find any of existing domains suitable for more permanent usage. Yes, and I believe that's the desirable situation. More permanent uses (such as the (mis)use of .local you mentioned) should make use of registered domains to en

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 08/04/2019 13:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage. On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 10:35, Xavier Humbert wrote: Is this not what the TLD /.invalid/ is supposed to be ? On 08.04.19 13:18, Matthew Pounsett wrote: RFC2606 reserves test, example,

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 10:35, Xavier Humbert wrote: > > On 08/04/2019 13:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage. > > Is this not what the TLD /.invalid/ is supposed to be ? RFC2606 reserves test, example, invalid, and localhost, for "testing an

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Kevin Darcy
If you're doing stuff at really small scale, you can just define your own root zone and put all of the records into it, including records in the "phishing" subdomain, and any reverse records you care about (in the "in-addr.arpa" and/or "ip6.arpa" subdomains). For that matter, if you only have 1 BIN

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Petr Mensik
On 4/8/19 3:42 PM, Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote: > I cannot use a registered domain name because I’am building a phishing demo > environment and I do not want to use an internet connection. How exactly is this different from using private TLD domain? In any way, you have to provide authorit

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Xavier Humbert
On 08/04/2019 13:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage. Is this not what the TLD /.invalid/ is supposed to be ? Xavier -- Xavier Humbert CRT Supervision et Exploitation de Niveau 1 Rectorat de Nancy-Metz 03 83 86 27 39 signature.asc Desc

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Tony Finch
Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote: > I cannot use a registered domain name because I’am building a phishing > demo environment and I do not want to use an internet connection. It's not particularly easy to get a resolver to work without an Internet connection. You'll need to set up your own root

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Karl Lovink via bind-users
I cannot use a registered domain name because I’am building a phishing demo environment and I do not want to use an internet connection. Met vriendelijke groet, Karl On 8 Apr 2019, at 13:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote: >>> I am trying to set up a privat

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Petr Mensik
On 4/8/19 1:05 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote: >>> I am trying to set up a private gTLD with BIND9 and underneath that gTLD >>> a subdomain. > > On 08.04.19 12:00, Tony Finch wrote: >> Why a TLD? >> >> You will have fewer problems if you get a properly reg

Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Tony Finch
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > many users/organizations use private TLDsm, just like they often use > private IP ranges instead of public. Smoking is popular too but that doesn't mean it's a good idea :-) > I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage. That's a very bad idea, becau

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote: I am trying to set up a private gTLD with BIND9 and underneath that gTLD a subdomain. On 08.04.19 12:00, Tony Finch wrote: Why a TLD? You will have fewer problems if you get a properly registered domain and set up a subdomain of that for private use. many

Re: Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Tony Finch
Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote: > I am trying to set up a private gTLD with BIND9 and underneath that gTLD > a subdomain. Why a TLD? You will have fewer problems if you get a properly registered domain and set up a subdomain of that for private use. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dota

Problem with zone delegation with private gTLD

2019-04-08 Thread Karl Lovink via bind-users
Hello, I am trying to set up a private gTLD with BIND9 and underneath that gTLD a subdomain. The subdomain runs on another BIND9 server. The problem I'am facing is that the BIND9 server of the gTLD gives a NXDOMAIN for the ns record of the subdomain. If have no clue what is wrong. Can somebody po