Re: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-08-02 Thread Danny Mayer
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 29.07.09 22:37, Abello, Vinny wrote: >> Considering 2003, 2003 R2, 2008, and 2008 R2 (technically done, but will >> officially release in October) have been released, I don't think dropping >> support for an ancient operating system from 9.5 years ago and roughly

Re: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-08-01 Thread Danny Mayer
Jukka Pakkanen wrote: > Unfortunately W2K was dropped a while ago, no safe version available for it. > Actually, less than a year ago. It became necessary. Danny > >> I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop >> for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark

Re: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-07-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 29.07.09 22:37, Abello, Vinny wrote: > Considering 2003, 2003 R2, 2008, and 2008 R2 (technically done, but will > officially release in October) have been released, I don't think dropping > support for an ancient operating system from 9.5 years ago and roughly 3 > prior generations that the vend

RE: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-07-29 Thread Abello, Vinny
dea. :) 2k boxes are time bombs, IMO. -Vinny > -Original Message- > From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users- > boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jukka Pakkanen > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:41 PM > To: Greg > Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Sub

Re: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-07-29 Thread Jukka Pakkanen
Unfortunately W2K was dropped a while ago, no safe version available for it. > I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop > for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I > want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what