Am 19.04.2017 um 06:52 schrieb i.chu...@volga.ttk.ru:
Hello all.
Regarding the "critical mass": I'm the one who downloads BIND from XP box
and I do it just to set it up on internal Linux machine. The reason to use
XP as PC OS is company's policy and lack of money after all. :)
P. S.: I can
t's technically
possible to build them."
--
With best regards, Igor Chudov.
Tel.: +7 937 266-51-34
От:
"Darcy Kevin (FCA)" <kevin.da...@fcagroup.com>
Кому:
"bind-users@lists.isc.org" <bind-users@lists.isc.org>,
Дата:
19.04.2017 02:59
Тема:
RE: BIND 9 windows
In message <20170418194105.06929a69@ime1.iment.local>, Paul Kosinski writes:
> I would think that a Internet-connected box that is severely
> compromised (e.g., has malware running with maximal privileges) is
> about as bad as having the LAN that the box is on connected to the
> Internet directly
inder to
> upgrade/replace/refresh their XP boxes?
>
>
> -
> Kevin
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
> Of Paul Kosinski Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2
Which we can assume is the reason Evan raised the question in the first place.
Stuart
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Darcy
Kevin (FCA)
Sent: Wednesday, 19 April 2017 8:59 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: BIND 9
, April 18, 2017 5:09 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND 9 windows XP builds
Yes, I suppose not every machine running BIND is connected to the Internet. But
how many are network inaccessible to every machine that
*is* connected to the Internet and might be compromised?
We run
- Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
> Of Paul Kosinski Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 9:08 PM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: BIND 9 windows XP builds
>
> I can see som
ing similar and tiny
available for windows native too
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Kosinski
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 9:08 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND 9 windows XP builds
I can see somebody running
to the Internet" is a much smaller subset
of *that* set.
- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Kosinski
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 9:08 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
M
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: [E] Re: BIND 9 windows XP builds
Hi there,
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Evan Hunt wrote:
... I wanted to find out whether there's a reason for so many people
to still be doing this -- even if it wasn't a very good reason --
before I cut them off.
Personally I'm
-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of G.W.
Haywood
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 10:28 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: [E] Re: BIND 9 windows XP builds
Hi there,
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Evan Hunt wrote:
> ... I wanted to find out whether there's a reason for so many people
> to
Hi there,
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Evan Hunt wrote:
... I wanted to find out whether there's a reason for so many people
to still be doing this -- even if it wasn't a very good reason --
before I cut them off.
Personally I'm more than a bit surprised, and even a little offended
that ISC still
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:08:28PM -0400, Paul Kosinski wrote:
> I can see somebody running XP for some "legacy" software that doesn't
> run nicely on newer versions of Windows, but I would think it extremely
> risky to have such a machine connected to the Internet.
Yes, it seems like an
I can see somebody running XP for some "legacy" software that doesn't
run nicely on newer versions of Windows, but I would think it extremely
risky to have such a machine connected to the Internet.
Maybe whoever runs BIND on XP should consider converting that machine to
Linux, and running BIND on
14 matches
Mail list logo
