RE: BIND 9.16.19 or any version newer than 9.16.15 does not start on Windows Server 2019

2021-09-17 Thread Richard T.A. Neal
I agree! BIND 9.16.21 is working just fine for me on Windows Server 2019 with either 8 or 12 vCPUs. Thanks, ISC BIND team. Richard. From: Sami Leino Sent: 17 September 2021 8:49 am To: Richard T.A. Neal ; bind-us...@isc.org Subject: VS: BIND 9.16.19 or any version newer than 9.16.15 does not

RE: BIND 9.16.19 or any version newer than 9.16.15 does not start on Windows Server 2019

2021-09-08 Thread Richard T.A. Neal
Hi Sami, I'm sorry but I've tried to do that again this evening but I can't get it to work. named.exe can take command line arguments to limit the number of vCPUs it will use, but I can't get this to work when running named.exe as a service. It *should* be the case that you can edit the

Re: BIND 9.16.19 or any version newer than 9.16.15 does not start on Windows Server 2019

2021-09-08 Thread G.W. Haywood via bind-users
Hi there, On Wed, 8 Sep 2021, Sami Leino wrote: I will return to this problem with 8 vCPU count. You wrote earlier that there could be a way to have BIND run a specific number of vCPU cores? Have you tried searching something like "windows processor affinity"? -- 73, Ged.

RE: BIND 9.16.19 or any version newer than 9.16.15 does not start on Windows Server 2019

2021-08-19 Thread Richard T.A. Neal
Hi Sami, Could you try changing the number of vCPUs to either 6, 7, 9, or 10 and see if it then starts OK? If that works then you can either leave it like that or we can help you with a way to have BIND run a specific number of vCPU cores while you put the VM back to 8 vCPUs. Best, Richard.

RE: BIND 9.16.19 or any version newer than 9.16.15 does not start on Windows Server 2019

2021-08-18 Thread Richard T.A. Neal
Hi Sami, There's presently an issue where the ISC BIND service (v9.16.19) won't start on a Windows server with either 8 or 12 vCPUs. How many CPUs (or vCPUs) are in this Windows Server? I didn't find that older versions were exhibiting the same issue so it might not be that, but it's at least