Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread R Dicaire
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Peter Janssen wrote: > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: > ns.nic.se. 3600IN A 212.247.7.228 > ns.nic.se. 3600IN 2a00:801:f0:53::53 > ns2.nic.se. 3600IN A 194.17.45.54 > ns3.nic.se.

RE: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Peter Janssen
users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Peter Janssen wrote: ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns.nic.se.              3600    IN      A       212.247.7.228 ns.nic.se.              3600    IN          2a00:801:f0:53::53 ns2.nic.se.             3600    IN  

Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Sten Carlsen
On 09/05/10 17:24, Peter Janssen wrote: > Hi, > > might be me, but I don't get it. > > ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 9 > ADDITIONAL: 9 But as you count to 8, where is number 9. I seem to be counting as Peter here. > > The issue I have with this is, dig an

Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread R Dicaire
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Peter Janssen wrote: > as per the header of Dig output… > ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 9 > Curious, I too get 9 but only 8 RRs are shown: ; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P1 <<>> +dnssec @rdb.ardynet.com ardynet.com ns ; (2 servers found) ;;

RE: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Peter Janssen
401 2750     peter.jans...@eurid.eu     http://www.eurid.eu     From: bind-users-bounces+peter.janssen=eurid...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounces+peter.janssen=eurid...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Sten Carlsen Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 17:48 To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Dig 9.

Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Shumon Huque
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 05:48:34PM +0200, Peter Janssen wrote: > Hi Rick, > > as per the header of Dig output? > ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 9 > > a part from that, I'm glad that my counting is still up to par :-) > > R. > --Pj. > > Peter Janssen > Technic

RE: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Chris Thompson
On May 9 2010, Peter Janssen wrote: Maybe this is related to the EDNS0 stuff? Precisely so. dig does not display the OPT RR in the reply (or that in the question if you use +qr, for that matter), but it's there in the additional section as you can see from the count. You don't have to use +dns

Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <023b01caef8b$c0e22860$42a679...@janssen@eurid.eu>, "Peter Janssen" writes: > Hi, > > might be me, but I don't get it. > The issue I have with this is, dig announces 9 additional section entries, > while 3 A, 1 and 4 RRSIG, in my book sums up to 8. The 9th record is the OPT rec

Fwd: Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Hauke Lampe
On 05/09/2010 05:24 PM, Peter Janssen wrote: > ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 9 > The issue I have with this is, dig announces 9 additional section entries, > while 3 A, 1 and 4 RRSIG, in my book sums up to 8. The additional section also contains the EDNS