Re: Re: .TLD minimum number of nameservers rule

2011-12-12 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:20 AM, wrote: > Thanks all. Chris, Anand that's very useful to know, sorry Jeff and Philippe, > your interesting suggestions wont work in this case. > > If I attack the problem from the other way down instead, the fact my current > registra doesn't allow me to add PTR or

Re: Re: .TLD minimum number of nameservers rule

2011-12-13 Thread nudgemac
> > What IS the problem, exactly? You're describing two things that > doesn't seem to be related: number of NS for a zone, and PTR/DNAME > records. My appologies if in an attempt to be succint, I failed to be clear. > > If you don't "own" an IP address, then usually you don't need to > bother a

Re: Re: .TLD minimum number of nameservers rule

2011-12-13 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:53 PM, wrote: >> > For instance, would this be a problem when implementing a >> > wide area bonjour subdomain using my own local dns server for clients that >> > are >> > mobile (internal/external) ? >> >> Bonjour should work even without a DNS server. > > Reminds me of

RE: Re: .TLD minimum number of nameservers rule

2011-12-13 Thread Timothe Litt
bind-us...@isc.org Subject: Re: Re: .TLD minimum number of nameservers rule > > What IS the problem, exactly? You're describing two things that > doesn't seem to be related: number of NS for a zone, and PTR/DNAME > records. My appologies if in an attempt to be succint, I fa