...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Sean Son
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 6:23 PM
To: Tony Finch
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: Regarding compiling BIND 9.10.3-p4 on a SystemD Distro
Thank you for the replies everyone. Are there any major differences between the
BIND package that Red Hat/CentOS
Thank you for the replies everyone. Are there any major differences between
the BIND package that Red Hat/CentOS provides vs the BIND package provided
by the ISC website?
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > That said named does wait for the
Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> That said named does wait for the loading to complete before the
> parent process exits and its exit status reflects if the load
> succeeded or not. See ns_os_daemonize() and ns_os_started().
OK, I'm feeling pretty stupid now, and I'm sorry for saying that named
doesn't d
In message , Tony
Finch writes:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > > The problem that I alluded to above is that if you have services that
> > > depend on the DNS, there should be a mechanism for the DNS server to say
> > > when it is ready and that it's OK to start services that need DNS. I don't
>
Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> Knot DNS, for example, has a compile-time option to link against systemd
> libraries. Then, when Knot starts, it loads all its zones in, does
> whatever else it needs to do, and then sends a notification via dbus.
>
> If anyone cares about this, they could open a feature re
On 23/03/16 14:51, Tony Finch wrote:
>> With systemd the methodology isn't that BIND notifies other things that
>> it is up. It is that other things, if dependent upon BIND, have in
>> their systemd files a requirement that BIND be up before they start.
>
> Yes, but how does systemd know when BI
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:51:58PM +, Tony Finch wrote:
> Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> >
> > With systemd the methodology isn't that BIND notifies other things that
> > it is up. It is that other things, if dependent upon BIND, have in
> > their systemd files a requirement that BIND be up before t
s here.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Finch [mailto:fa...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tony Finch
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:52 AM
To: Lightner, Jeff
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Regarding compiling BIND 9.10.3-p4 on a SystemD Distro
Lightner, Jeff wrote:
>
> Wit
Lightner, Jeff wrote:
>
> With systemd the methodology isn't that BIND notifies other things that
> it is up. It is that other things, if dependent upon BIND, have in
> their systemd files a requirement that BIND be up before they start.
Yes, but how does systemd know when BIND is up?
(The Red
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 23.03.2016 um 13:36 schrieb Tony Finch:
> >
> > BIND does not do that - it forks too early. It's a bit tiresome
>
> than this is a bug in BIND which should be fixed instead worked around -
Yes.
> the whol epurpose of double-forking is to signal to the caller that
> init
rding compiling BIND 9.10.3-p4 on a SystemD Distro
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > The problem that I alluded to above is that if you have services
> > that depend on the DNS, there should be a mechanism for the DNS
> > server to say when it is ready and that it's OK to start
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > The problem that I alluded to above is that if you have services that
> > depend on the DNS, there should be a mechanism for the DNS server to say
> > when it is ready and that it's OK to start services that need DNS. I don't
> > know the right way to specify that to sys
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 23.03.2016 um 11:54 schrieb Tony Finch:
> >
> > There's a sample unit file in the chroot setup instructions at
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Bind9
> >
> > (It looks a bit half-baked to me since it doesn't seem to have any way to
> > signal systemd that named has finished st
Sean Son wrote:
>
> I recently compiled and installed BIND 9.10.3-p4 from source on a system
> running CentOS 7. This is for practice purposes. Ive been searching all of
> the net and I cannot find the answer to this one question of mine: How do I
> create the systemd service unit configuration fi
This is not specifically a bind question but rather a centos/red hat
question, but I think the below will get you on the right track:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-Managing_Services_with_systemd-Unit_Files.html
On Tue
15 matches
Mail list logo
