In article ,
James Roberts-Thomson wrote:
> However, I'm not sure why it was working when only one nameserver was
> specified if the server wouldn't allow recursion in the first place. The
> nameservers are supposed to be authoritative for the domains in question in
> the first place, so I'm
Hi Jeff,
>Did I misread your original problem? I thought you said it worked if
>you had only one of the nameservers in resolv.conf. You didn't state
>but I assume (that word again) that you meant if either of your
>nameservers was there by itself it worked?
No, you did not misread the problem;
In message , "Lightner
, Jeff" writes:
> Did I misread your original problem? I thought you said it worked if
> you had only one of the nameservers in resolv.conf. You didn't state
> but I assume (that word again) that you meant if either of your
> nameservers was there by itself it worked?
>
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Unexpected issues with "nslookup" command
Hi Mark,
>allow-recursion defaults to "{ localnets; localhost; };".
>If the client was not on a directly connected network it
>will NOT get recursion by default.
So it would seem; I had made a
Hi Mark,
>allow-recursion defaults to "{ localnets; localhost; };".
>If the client was not on a directly connected network it
>will NOT get recursion by default.
So it would seem; I had made an assumption about subnetting that apparently was
not entirely accurate. Oh well, you know what they sa
In message <9b2fff1719120e4c83de53c2f70cc60755d5899...@secmclust01a.corp.ssi.go
vt.nz>, James Roberts-Thomson writes:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for your response; whilst I accept what your saying, I'm not convinced
> it applies in this case.
>
> As far as I can tell, recursion is enabled on the serv
15:34:37.026 client
x.x.x.x#35622: recursion available"
Thanks,
James Roberts-Thomson
-Original Message-
From: ma...@isc.org [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
Sent: Friday, 16 April 2010 2:57 p.m.
To: James Roberts-Thomson
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Unexpected iss
In message <9b2fff1719120e4c83de53c2f70cc60755d5899...@secmclust01a.corp.ssi.go
vt.nz>, James Roberts-Thomson writes:
>
> Can anyone explain what may be happening here, please?
Stub resolvers really should be talking to nameservers that offer
recursion. If it is talking to a nameserver that does
8 matches
Mail list logo
