Re: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / pubmed

2010-08-19 Thread Phil Mayers
On 08/18/2010 06:55 PM, Dave Sparro wrote: On 8/18/2010 1:12 PM, Casey Deccio wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Dave Sparrodspa...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/18/2010 8:30 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: ...since the ncbi zone is an unsigned child zone, there needs to be an NSEC/NSEC3 record to

Re: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / pubmed

2010-08-19 Thread Lyle Giese
I agree with this idea. Sorta like when a browser is presented with an invalid SSL cert by a website. It could be that you put in example.com when the cert is for www.example.com or in the case of a self-signed cert, as long as I am not giving them sensitive data, I, the user, can accept or deny

RE: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / pubmed

2010-08-18 Thread Lightner, Jeff
It comes right up in Firefox but prompts for a username and password. Dig shows: dig www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ; DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 22983 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY:

Re: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / pubmed

2010-08-18 Thread Phil Mayers
On 18/08/10 13:30, Phil Mayers wrote: On 18/08/10 13:15, Lightner, Jeff wrote: It comes right up in Firefox but prompts for a username and password. Do you have DNSSEC validation enabled? Because as per my email, it's a DNSSEC problem. Damn - in fact sorry, scratch that. I realise my

Re: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / pubmed

2010-08-18 Thread Phil Mayers
On 18/08/10 13:15, Lightner, Jeff wrote: It comes right up in Firefox but prompts for a username and password. Do you have DNSSEC validation enabled? Because as per my email, it's a DNSSEC problem. After a bit of investigation, it seems that the problem is a missing NSEC/NSEC3 record in

Re: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / pubmed

2010-08-18 Thread Casey Deccio
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: After a bit of investigation, it seems that the problem is a missing NSEC/NSEC3 record in the empty reply for: $ dig +dnssec @165.112.4.230 ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ds ...since the ncbi zone is an unsigned child zone, there

Re: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / pubmed

2010-08-18 Thread Dave Sparro
On 8/18/2010 8:30 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 18/08/10 13:15, Lightner, Jeff wrote: It comes right up in Firefox but prompts for a username and password. Do you have DNSSEC validation enabled? Because as per my email, it's a DNSSEC problem. After a bit of investigation, it seems that the

Re: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / pubmed

2010-08-18 Thread Casey Deccio
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Dave Sparro dspa...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/18/2010 8:30 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: ...since the ncbi zone is an unsigned child zone, there needs to be an NSEC/NSEC3 record to prove the absence of the DS record, and have a secure delegation to an unsigned child

Re: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / pubmed

2010-08-18 Thread Dave Sparro
On 8/18/2010 1:12 PM, Casey Deccio wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Dave Sparrodspa...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/18/2010 8:30 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: ...since the ncbi zone is an unsigned child zone, there needs to be an NSEC/NSEC3 record to prove the absence of the DS record, and have a

Re: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov / pubmed

2010-08-18 Thread Casey Deccio
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Dave Sparro dspa...@gmail.com wrote: It seems to me that the OP wanted a work-around to the fact that his end users couldn't use the website due to a validation failure. It still seems to me that working around that situation misses the point of using DNSSEC.