Re: Forward first showing odd behavior BIND 9.11.36-RedHat-9.11.36-16.el8_10.4 (Extended Support Version)

2025-09-05 Thread Ondřej Surý
> And since we don’t want these following the full recursion out to the > internet, root hints are intentionally disabled (we’re hoping for at least > some data hygiene by using these specific forwarders). That's forward only. > Setting it to ‘forward only’ resolved the issue. See above. > Do

Re: Forward first showing odd behavior BIND 9.11.36-RedHat-9.11.36-16.el8_10.4 (Extended Support Version)

2025-09-05 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi David. I find your configuration a bit bizarre because you say you don't want recursion, yet you have both "recursion yes;" and "forward first;' (which is the default anyway, so this statement is redundant). "recursion yes;" says to attempt recursion unless something else (like forwarding) say

Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system

2025-09-03 Thread Havard Eidnes via bind-users
of make install ? An attempt with (as root, as I'm expecting root-only-writable destination directories to be touched): # meson install -C build-dir is not entirely successful. For some reason the build system decides to re-do parts of the build, and parts of it now complains, and it s

Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system

2025-09-03 Thread Petr Špaček
On 03. 09. 25 14:53, Havard Eidnes wrote: Does https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter10.html#building-bind-9 help? Yes, it gets me a bit further. The current stumbling block is that the configury system can't find liburcu-common (despite finding the other rcu libs), seemingly that's be

Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system

2025-09-03 Thread Ondřej Surý
Uh oh, I wrote this before I checked the meson.build: We actually should have the workaround in meson too: ## userspace-rcu urcu_dep = [dependency('liburcu-cds', version: '>=0.10.0')] if rcu_flavor == 'membarrier' config.set('RCU_MEMBARRIER', true) urcu_dep += dependency('liburcu', versio

Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system

2025-09-03 Thread Ondřej Surý
Well, we had this workaround for urcu << 0.13 in configure.ac, but I would suggest that you should rather use the latest urcu release instead of adding the workaround back to meson.build. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org My working hours and your working hours may be different. Pleas

Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system

2025-09-03 Thread Havard Eidnes via bind-users
> Does > https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter10.html#building-bind-9 > help? Yes, it gets me a bit further. The current stumbling block is that the configury system can't find liburcu-common (despite finding the other rcu libs), seemingly that's because the pkg-config file for that libr

Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system

2025-09-03 Thread Petr Špaček
On 03. 09. 25 12:31, Havard Eidnes via bind-users wrote: as previously announced, the BIND 9.21 (development branch) has changed the build system from venerable autotools to meson build system. If you build BIND 9 from sources now would be a good time to try building the development version from

Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system

2025-09-03 Thread Havard Eidnes via bind-users
> as previously announced, the BIND 9.21 (development branch) has > changed the build system from venerable autotools to meson > build system. If you build BIND 9 from sources now would be a > good time to try building the development version from sources > and report any issues you find to our Git

Re: Bind forwards DNS requests even though forwarding is disabled.

2025-09-03 Thread Ondřej Surý
No, the forwarding is disabled if the forwarding list is empty. What you can probably do is to create a sinkhole address on the localhost (with DROP firewall rule) and forward to that. However, why not just disable recursion or properly forward to the AdGuard DNS server instead? Both are perfect

Re: Bind forwards DNS requests even though forwarding is disabled.

2025-09-03 Thread Sten Carlsen
You still have the "forward only;" and "forwarders" statements. Would commenting those out make a difference? -- Best regards Sten Carlsen Don't be impressed with unintelligible stuff said condescendingly . -- Radia Perlman. > On 2 Sep 2025, at 20.12, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > https://bind

Re: Bind forwards DNS requests even though forwarding is disabled.

2025-09-03 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi Sascha. I have a few questions. 1) Are you sure BIND is forwarding? Is that the term you mean to use? Please can you take a binary packet capture (pcap, not copy/paste of terminal output) that shows what the BIND server is doing and send that, You may have disabled global forwarding but recursio

Re: Bind forwards DNS requests even though forwarding is disabled.

2025-09-03 Thread Ondřej Surý
https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9.20.12/reference.html#namedconf-statement-forwarders > The default is the empty list (no forwarding). ^^^ you've effectively disabled forwarding. You haven't described precisely what are you trying to achieve, but you probably want to disable recursion? https:

Re: Bind forwards DNS requests even though forwarding is disabled.

2025-09-03 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hello again and thank you for the background. Firstly, tcpdump. I would recommend a command like this, run in a separate terminal window just before you make some test queries in another window: sudo tcpdump -v -i any -c 1 -w port 53 The -c is a safety net to make sure it stops, should you

Re: Bind forwards DNS requests even though forwarding is disabled.

2025-09-02 Thread Sascha Marcel Hacker via bind-users
First of all, thank you for your quick response. In this case, “forwarding” may be somewhat of a misplaced term. What I want to achieve, and what has been working for over 5 years, is for BIND DNS to act as the primary DNS for DNS queries relating to intranet name resolution (Samba AD), and for A

Re: BIND9.18.33 after upgrade to this version, same BIND configuration no longer accepts dynamic DNS updates with SIG0 keypairs

2025-09-02 Thread Petr Špaček
On 01. 09. 25 21:37, Adam Burns wrote: I'm trying to debug some dynamic update zones (using SIG0 keys) after a BIND version upgrade, and I'm hoing someone on this list can give advice on potential root cause or at least suggestions on how to debug ... FTR info on root cause is in the Release No

Re: BIND9.18.33 after upgrade to this version, same BIND configuration no longer accepts dynamic DNS updates with SIG0 keypairs

2025-09-01 Thread Mark Andrews
Upgrade to 9.20. Some computational denial of service fixes involving SIG(0) where not back ported to 9.18 but rather the path was just disabled. > On 2 Sep 2025, at 05:37, Adam Burns wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to debug some dynamic update zones (using SIG0 keys) after a BIND > versio

RE: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work.

2025-08-28 Thread Steve Gladden
could see them. -Steve -Original Message- From: Mark Andrews Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 8:19 PM To: Steve Gladden Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work. > On 28 Aug 2025, at 10:01, Steve

RE: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work

2025-08-27 Thread Steve Gladden
, 2025 9:30 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work Read the post from Mark Andrews again. To check whether or not the “local” zone has the delegation loading correctly, recursion MUST be turned off when submitting

RE: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work

2025-08-27 Thread Steve Gladden
All good! I'm up & running now. And learned some stuff. -Steve -Original Message- From: bind-users On Behalf Of Steve Gladden Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 9:51 PM To: Robert McDonald (Bob) ; bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: Trying simple NS delegation for a subd

RE: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work

2025-08-27 Thread Steve Gladden
Oh sweet, I'll try that! -sg -Original Message- From: bind-users On Behalf Of Robert McDonald (Bob) Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 9:30 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work Read the post from

RE: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work.

2025-08-27 Thread Steve Gladden
fix it. From: Al Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 9:14 PM To: Steve Gladden Subject: Re: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work. chatgpt was pretty coherent for once: That message comes from BIND (named) when it tries to resolve a domain and gets a

Re: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work

2025-08-27 Thread Robert McDonald (Bob)
Read the post from Mark Andrews again. To check whether or not the “local” zone has the delegation loading correctly, recursion MUST be turned off when submitting the query. In the dig command add the switch +norecurse (or just +norec). That will get rid of the SERVFAIL response. Start there.

RE: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work.

2025-08-27 Thread Steve Gladden
add the record. This has me stuck as I can’t add the zone on the remote system, AND I can’t simply add the NS record on my local system. Thanks. -Steve From: Al Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 8:13 PM To: Steve Gladden Subject: Re: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot g

Re: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work.

2025-08-27 Thread Mark Andrews
> On 28 Aug 2025, at 10:01, Steve Gladden wrote: > > Hi this is my first post ever. > I’m stuck on a very simple task that I have not been able to get it to work. > I have done this in the past with older versions of BIND but it has been > quite a while. > > I’m trying to delegate to a

Re: FreeBSD-14.3 nsupdate krb5 failure (beyond issue 4436)

2025-08-26 Thread Ondřej Surý
Well, this: https://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos-announce/2025q3/thread.html#208 Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 26. 8. 2025, at 14:51, Pe

Re: FreeBSD-14.3 nsupdate krb5 failure (beyond issue 4436)

2025-08-26 Thread Peter 'PMc' Much
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 02:02:46PM +0200, Petr Špaček wrote: ! On 26. 08. 25 13:24, Petr Špaček wrote: ! > On 26. 08. 25 12:31, Peter 'PMc' Much wrote: ! > > Out of recvsoa ! > > recvgss() ! > > recvgss creating rcvmsg ! > > show_message() ! > > recvmsg reply from GSS-TSIG query ! > > ;; ->>HEADER<

Re: FreeBSD-14.3 nsupdate krb5 failure (beyond issue 4436)

2025-08-26 Thread Peter 'PMc' Much
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 02:34:34PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: ! Hmm, given the recent f^Hhiccup in mit krb5, I would suggest to try less recent version and/or report this to upstream. Ondrej, I am not familiar with these. Do You have a link or two? As one might have noticed I am not yet familiar

Re: FreeBSD-14.3 nsupdate krb5 failure (beyond issue 4436)

2025-08-26 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hmm, given the recent f^Hhiccup in mit krb5, I would suggest to try less recent version and/or report this to upstream. -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 25. 8. 20

Re: FreeBSD-14.3 nsupdate krb5 failure (beyond issue 4436)

2025-08-26 Thread Petr Špaček
On 26. 08. 25 13:24, Petr Špaček wrote: On 26. 08. 25 12:31, Peter 'PMc' Much wrote: Out of recvsoa recvgss() recvgss creating rcvmsg show_message() recvmsg reply from GSS-TSIG query ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id:  41256 ;; flags: qr ra; QUESTION: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0,

Re: FreeBSD-14.3 nsupdate krb5 failure (beyond issue 4436)

2025-08-26 Thread Petr Špaček
On 26. 08. 25 12:31, Peter 'PMc' Much wrote: Out of recvsoa recvgss() recvgss creating rcvmsg show_message() recvmsg reply from GSS-TSIG query ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41256 ;; flags: qr ra; QUESTION: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;5466

Re: FreeBSD-14.3 nsupdate krb5 failure (beyond issue 4436)

2025-08-26 Thread Peter 'PMc' Much
Hi Michal, glad to read You! On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 08:50:51AM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote: ! So it looks like krb5 is unable to process the initial GSS-API token ! sent by nsupdate - something inside krb5 returns the ! KRB5_CRYPTO_INTERNAL error code. ! ! Could you perhaps start named with th

Re: bind9.20.11-4deb and Windows Server 2015 DNS Problem

2025-08-26 Thread Petr Špaček
On 26. 08. 25 9:25, Daniel Marquez-Klaka wrote: I recently upgraded from Deb12 to Deb 13 and thereby from bind 9.18.33-1deb to 9.20.11-4deb. While in former version everything was running as expected I observed a (to me) strange behavior between bind9.20.11-4-deb and Windows Server 2016, Versio

Re: Windows versions of bind tools

2025-08-26 Thread Arsen STASIC
Hi Robert, You could install Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) and a Linux distribution of your choice and you should be able to run bind-tools. cheers arsen * Ondřej Surý [2025-08-25 20:19 (+0200)]: > Nope, no plans for Windows release. Of rather, there is a plan to not release > anything on

Re: FreeBSD-14.3 nsupdate krb5 failure (beyond issue 4436)

2025-08-25 Thread Michał Kępień
Hi Peter, > This is the error: > - > recvmsg reply from GSS-TSIG query > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4885 > ;; flags: qr ra; QUESTION: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;3478577972.sig-conr-e.int

Re: Windows versions of bind tools

2025-08-25 Thread Ondřej Surý
Nope, no plans for Windows release. Of rather, there is a plan to not release anything on Windows in the future. FTR new releases work fine on Mac and are available from homebrew or macports. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please d

RE: forwarders order

2025-08-25 Thread DEMBLANS Mathieu
forwarders? I don't find a way to do this -Message d'origine- De : Mark Andrews Envoyé : samedi 23 août 2025 22:55 À : DEMBLANS Mathieu Cc : bind-users@lists.isc.org Objet : Re: forwarders order It is smoothed RTT. Forwarders however have highly variable RTT as the records usu

Re: DNSSEC policy using wrong directory?

2025-08-24 Thread Mike
Mark Andrews wrote: > Just put the zone file somewhere named can do that. OK, thanks, that works. I see you answer this every few years. For secured environments, it'd be better if BIND copied the file over to the working directory itself. In a typical OCI/Docker image, the configuration will b

Re: DNSSEC policy using wrong directory?

2025-08-24 Thread Mark Andrews
When you use dnssec-policy named updates the zone content. It then wants to write the updated zone content back out. It does this by writing a temporary file and when that is complete atomically switching that file with the old zone file. Just put the zone file somewhere named can do that. --

Re: DNSSEC policy using wrong directory?

2025-08-24 Thread Mike
I should have mentioned that `managed-keys.bind{,.jnl}` are written (correctly) to /var/cache/bind. So the `directory` option is doing its job, just not for the `dnssec-policy` journals. But `Kgood-with-numbers.com.*` *are* going into /var/cache/bind, so `dnssec-policy` is getting that part corr

Re: DNSSEC policy using wrong directory?

2025-08-24 Thread Ondřej Surý
And the corresponding option: https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference.html#namedconf-statement-journal -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 24. 8. 2025, at

Re: DNSSEC policy using wrong directory?

2025-08-24 Thread Ondřej Surý
https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/stable/chapter6.html#the-journal-file -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 24. 8. 2025, at 3:54, Mike wrote: > > I just set up `dnss

Re: DNSSEC policy using wrong directory?

2025-08-24 Thread Benny Pedersen via bind-users
Mike skrev den 2025-08-24 03:50: I just set up `dnssec-policy default;` in my zones. Now I'm seeing error messages like: general: error: /etc/bind/good-with-numbers.com.signed.jnl: create: permission denied Well, yeah, that's a read-only file system. options { directory "/var/cache

Re: forwarders order

2025-08-23 Thread Mark Andrews
It is smoothed RTT. Forwarders however have highly variable RTT as the records usually needs to be looked up from the authoritative servers so what you end up measuring is RTT + resolution time. RRsets expire at the same time on both the local caching server and the forwarders. > On 21 Aug 2

Re: meson - rpath and chroot

2025-08-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
he bind build. Now I know why my binaries could not > find their libraries (I edited meson.build to re-add rpath). Am I the only > end-user who still uses --prefix ? > > I also noticed that the new bind is missing chroot support; I cannot find any > mention of this change in

Re: selective forwarding resolver that isn't being selective

2025-08-20 Thread Mike
I'm starting to notice peculiarities of the Kubernetes + Calico + Istio environment that the server is running in. Haven't determined if that's the cause yet. But Istio adds iptables nat rules *into the container* that affect port 53 communication. IDK how it affects it yet, but I raised it on t

Re: selective forwarding resolver that isn't being selective

2025-08-20 Thread Mike
Doug Freed wrote: > It would be helpful if we could see your actual BIND configuration Thanks for replying. Attached. include "/etc/bind/named.conf.options"; include "/etc/bind/named.conf.local"; acl internals { localhost; /* internal CIDRs */; }; // internal systems options { version

Re: selective forwarding resolver that isn't being selective

2025-08-20 Thread Doug Freed
On 8/20/25 12:27, Mike wrote: I set up BIND9 9.20 as a container in a Kubernetes cluster so that it could provide DNS services for all of my internal systems, via an "internal" view. Currently it also provides authoritative responses for some secondary servers in a hidden master configuration, bu

Re: New BIND releases are available: 9.18.39, 9.20.12, 9.21.11

2025-08-20 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hey all, let me highlight the one change we’ve backported from the development branch: https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9.20.12/changelog.html The adaptive strategy for memory allocation prepared by Alessio. This backport should significantly reduce the memory use for deployments with many smal

Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system

2025-08-18 Thread Stacey Marshall
On 18 Aug 2025, at 14:24, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi Stacey, > > I am not sure if I fully understand your question, but I'll try to answer... >> On 18. 8. 2025, at 15:17, Stacey Marshall wrote: >> >> For production does the cmocka option need to be disabled, -Dcmocka=disabled? >> A cursory look sugg

Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system

2025-08-18 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi Stacey, I am not sure if I fully understand your question, but I'll try to answer... > On 18. 8. 2025, at 15:17, Stacey Marshall wrote: > > For production does the cmocka option need to be disabled, -Dcmocka=disabled? > A cursory look suggests it is only used within the test code. > I note th

Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system

2025-08-18 Thread Stacey Marshall
On 4 Aug 2025, at 17:31, Stacey Marshall wrote: The 9.21 test framework has an additional requirement on CMocka, from README.md Unit tests are implemented using the CMocka unit testing framework. To build them, use the option `-Dcmocka=enabled`. Execution of unit tests is done by the meson'

Re: dnssec

2025-08-11 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hello Renzo. There is no point spending time answering these questions for a version of BIND that is now obsolete. As I suggested in your other post, follow the instructions in the KB article and install 9.20. After that, if you still have questions, come back. Please also read the documentation a

Re: define zone

2025-08-08 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi. 1a correct 1b no because you have disabled recursion 1c OK But as I said, if you also have "forward only;" (recommended) it won't try to recurse, so hints are irrelevant. 2 Your choice. Use packet captures to see what queries CS is receiving and deal with them appropriately. Tuning must be you

Re: define zone

2025-08-07 Thread Renzo Marengo
Hi Greg, Thanks for your help. 1) Just so I'm clear, if I made this configuration: global forwarding DISABLED zone "." MISSING recursion ENABLE a- server would contact root servers because hints are bulti-in, right ? b- with same configuration with recursion DISABLED, server would conta

Re: define zone

2025-08-07 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi again, Renzo. 1) Regarding root hints, the explicit hint zone has not been necessary in BIND for many years as the hints are built-in. This applies if your resolver is doing recursion. But if you are doing global forwarding - with "forward only;" as well - then "zone "." {" is pointless anyway.

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-08-06 Thread stuart--- via bind-users
> From: bind-users on behalf of Greg Choules > via bind-users > Reply to: Greg Choules > Date: Wednesday 6 August 2025 at 20:06 > To: Renzo Marengo > Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" > Subject: Re: configure bind in chroot jailenzo. The Linux distros packag

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-08-06 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi Renzo. The Linux distros package their own versions of BIND, which they obtain from ISC and patch over the years, hence it is almost guaranteed to not be the latest. That may be OK for you. But see here for how to install it directly if you choose: https://kb.isc.org/docs/isc-packages-for-bind-9

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-08-06 Thread Renzo Marengo
Hi greg, I'm replacing old DNS virtual server with old Bind with new one. So I thought to build the same box with the same chroot which gives me jail environment where *Bind is not able to access system files or outside data.* But your words are making me think...*if you say it's not necessary.* I

Re: ISC-Bind Cache preserveration

2025-08-05 Thread Mark Andrews
No. If you want robustness secondary every internal zone in your recursive servers. At the minimum secondary the zones at the top of every internal namespace. Set up also-notify so they stay up to date on changes. -- Mark Andrews > El 6 ago 2025, a las 5:34, Michael Mullig via bind-users

Re: ISC-Bind Cache preserveration

2025-08-05 Thread Marco Moock
Am 05.08.2025 um 19:33:55 Uhr schrieb Michael Mullig via bind-users: > We're using ISC-Bind (v 9.16.45) out at remote locations to serve as > part of local DNS service in the event of a WAN outage. However we > are faced with the possibility that we might also suffer a power > outage at these loca

Re: ISC-Bind Cache preserveration

2025-08-05 Thread Danilo Godec via bind-users
Hello, you could configure Bind at remote locations as secondaries for your internal domains, so that they have a copy of the zone locally. Other, non-internal domains probably don't matter while WAN isn't working.  

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-08-05 Thread Ben Scott
> From: "Renzo Marengo" > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2025 7:11:02 AM > I want to install latest rpm of Bind (9.16.23-31) for Oracle Linux 9 to create > only cache DNS server which is running in chroot jail. > I installed several Bind packages included bind-chroot. > What document do you suggest me

Re: confgiure bind files and after run chroot script ?

2025-08-05 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi Renzo. Firstly, please ditch 9.16, it's end of life and take a look at the latest 9.20 Secondly, you didn't respond to points made in your other post about chroot; i.e. why you think you need it. Cheers, Greg On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 at 12:52, Renzo Marengo wrote: > to configure Bind 9.16.23-RH in

Re: DNS-over-HTTP Issue

2025-08-04 Thread Ondřej Surý
Your DNS client needs to use HTTP/2-without-TLS, not plain HTTP/1. -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 4. 8. 2025, at 18:53, Metin Akin wrote: > >  > Hi all, > >

Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system

2025-08-04 Thread Stacey Marshall
On 16 Jul 2025, at 19:35, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi, > > as previously announced, the BIND 9.21 (development branch) has changed the > build > system from venerable autotools to meson build system. If you build BIND 9 > from sources > now would be a good time to try building the development versio

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-08-01 Thread Fred Morris
To add to what Greg says.. On Fri, 1 Aug 2025, Greg Choules via bind-users wrote: I would suggest that, if you are really worried about losing control of a process, or it being used for remote access to your machine, or something (are either of these why you think you need chroot?) you should e

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-08-01 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi Renzo. This is not intended to sound negative. But why are you stuck on chroot? What benefit do you think it will bring you? It used to be the case (many years ago) that if you started BIND as root, it ran as root and chroot made sense then. But not anymore. It starts with some privilege, to sca

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-08-01 Thread Danjel Jungersen via bind-users
Have you looked here: https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/html/managing_networking_infrastructure_services/assembly_setting-up-and-configuring-a-bind-dns-server_networking-infrastructure-services They have a short mentioning of chroot. :-) Danjel On 7/31/2025 9:

Re: BIND from brew on OSX - Crash

2025-07-31 Thread Mark Andrews
Also anything that causes the operating system to crash should be reported to the operating system vendor. There should be nothing that an application can do that can cause an operating system to crash. Named is just an application as far as the operating system is concerned. One of the prim

Re: BIND from brew on OSX - Crash

2025-07-31 Thread Ondřej Surý
Casey, we have reports that this has been fixed in the very latest update of the macOS. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 31. 7. 2025, at 18:43, Casey Decc

Re: BIND from brew on OSX - Crash

2025-07-31 Thread Casey Deccio
> On Jul 31, 2025, at 2:16 AM, Petr Špaček wrote: > > On 30. 07. 25 22:24, Casey Deccio wrote: >>> On Jul 24, 2025, at 1:00 AM, stuart--- via bind-users >> us...@lists.isc.org> wrote: >>> >>> This is mostly just me wondering if this is just a "me" issue or whether >>> this is endemic of BIND o

Re: BIND from brew on OSX - Crash

2025-07-31 Thread Petr Špaček
On 30. 07. 25 22:24, Casey Deccio wrote: On Jul 24, 2025, at 1:00 AM, stuart--- via bind-users us...@lists.isc.org> wrote: This is mostly just me wondering if this is just a "me" issue or whether this is endemic of BIND on OSX. I use BIND as distributed by brew.sh on OSX (14.7.6, M2 Pro) fo

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-07-31 Thread Ondřej Surý
Perhaps the question that you should explore first would be “Why?” and not “How?”. Then perhaps you should define what you are trying to achieve and ask yourself if it still make sense and what is the current state of art.I believe that dropping caps and having properly set up selinux (or AppArmor)

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-07-31 Thread Danjel Jungersen via bind-users
On Debian I installed bind9 bind9utils and bind9-doc Edited configuration, restarted services. Nothing was changed or enabled besides what is mentioned below. Sorry for not being able to help more, have not used redhat or related, for more years than I like to remember ;-) I remember using ve

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-07-30 Thread Renzo Marengo
Thank you very much but my issue is to understand what first step I have to do, considering that the following rpm are just installed: bind.x86_64 bind-chroot.x86_64 bind-dnssec-doc.noarch bind-dnssec-utils.x86_64 bind-libs.x86_64 bind-license.noarch bind-utils.x86_64 e.g. chroot folder structure

Re: bind-users Digest, Vol 4771, Issue 2

2025-07-30 Thread Chris Fairfield
Could you open an issue on GitLab? https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues If you could provide a coredump from the assertion failure, that may help Engineering track this down more easily. Thanks! -Doug Freed Hi Doug, Thanks, I've gone ahead and done that: https://gitlab.isc.org/

Re: Assertion failure when using tsig keys in v.9.20

2025-07-30 Thread Doug Freed
On 7/30/25 15:39, Chris Fairfield wrote: Hi all, I'm hoping to get some guidance into an unusual Assertion Failure we're encountering. We're in the process of migrating our DNS Servers to Ubuntu-based hosts, and as part of that we're also migrating to using tsig keys to help manage our  int

Re: BIND from brew on OSX - Crash

2025-07-30 Thread Casey Deccio
> On Jul 24, 2025, at 1:00 AM, stuart--- via bind-users > wrote: > > This is mostly just me wondering if this is just a "me" issue or whether this > is endemic of BIND on OSX. > > I use BIND as distributed by brew.sh on OSX (14.7.6, M2 Pro) for local > testing of various things and ran into

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-07-30 Thread Danjel Jungersen via bind-users
On 7/30/2025 1:11 PM, Renzo Marengo wrote: I want to install latest rpm of Bind (9.16.23-31) for Oracle Linux 9 to create only cache DNS server which is running in chroot jail. I installed several Bind packages included bind-chroot. What document do you suggest me to follow to configure bind in

Re: configure bind in chroot jail

2025-07-30 Thread Darren Ankney
Hi, I am not aware of a specific guide for doing this. There is information in the ARM however: - https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter7.html#chroot-and-setuid - https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/latest/manpages.html#cmdoption-named-t - https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/latest/manpages.html#

Re: DNSSEC validation broken trust July 22-23rd time.nist.gov

2025-07-25 Thread J Doe
Hi Julian, Ok, thanks.  It slipped my mind to use DNSviz - thank you for mentioning it. - J On 7/24/25 01:19, Julian Panke wrote: Hi, DNSviz is showing the issue very clearly so it was not on your side https://dnsviz.net/d/time.nist.gov/aID54g/dnssec/ regards Julian Panke Urspr

Re: mysterious failures/wrong-answers in reverse DNS lookup

2025-07-24 Thread Michael Richardson
Mark Andrews wrote: > This is consistent with dns64 being configured with a prefix of > 2607:f0b0:f::/96. Have you been playing around with dns64? Yes. I do use exactly that! I didn't connect that ::babe:f00d was within that /96 when I put my dns64 there. So this is a synthesized rever

Re: mysterious failures/wrong-answers in reverse DNS lookup

2025-07-24 Thread Mark Andrews
This is consistent with dns64 being configured with a prefix of 2607:f0b0:f::/96. Have you been playing around with dns64? > On 23 Jul 2025, at 15:19, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > obiwan-[~](3.3.8) mcr 10027 %dig @nic.sandelman.ca -x 2607:f0b0:f::babe:f00d > ptr > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > d.

Re: mysterious failures/wrong-answers in reverse DNS lookup

2025-07-24 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025, Michael Richardson wrote: > nic.sandelman.ca. is also authoritatively serving: > 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.f.0.0.0.0.b.0.f.7.0.6.2.ip6.arpa. 86400 IN SOA > . . 0 28800 7200 604800 86400 > 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.f.0.0.0.0.b.0.f.7.0.6.2.ip6.arpa. 0 IN NS . > T

Re: BIND from brew on OSX - Crash

2025-07-24 Thread James L. Brown via bind-users
Have you tried bind in the latest macOS beta versions? James. > On 24 Jul 2025, at 5:00 pm, stuart--- via bind-users > wrote: > > Hi, > > This is mostly just me wondering if this is just a "me" issue or whether this > is endemic of BIND on OSX. > > I use BIND as distributed by brew.sh on OS

Re: DNSSEC validation broken trust July 22-23rd time.nist.gov

2025-07-23 Thread Julian Panke via bind-users
Hi, DNSviz is showing the issue very clearly so it was not on your side https://dnsviz.net/d/time.nist.gov/aID54g/dnssec/ regards Julian Panke Ursprüngliche Nachricht Am 24.07.25 00:18 schrieb J Doe : > Hi, > > I have a small mail server that is using: BIND 9.20.11 and

Re: mysterious failures/wrong-answers in reverse DNS lookup

2025-07-23 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025, Michael Richardson wrote: When I ask from the IETF123 network: ;; SERVER: 31.130.231.0#53(31.130.231.0) (UDP) ;; ANSWER SECTION: d.0.0.f.e.b.a.b.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.f.0.0.0.0.b.0.f.7.0.6.2.ip6.arpa. 7200 IN PTR nic.sandelman.ca. which is entirely correct. Probably 3

Re: suggetsed distro for Bind

2025-07-23 Thread Carlos Horowicz via bind-users
Well I meant you can run docker containers inside a vm with qemu emulated hardware, that'd be the bad scenario ...you're right containers on bare-metal have full visibility of the Instruction set On 23/07/2025 15:19, Ondřej Surý wrote: Docker/Podman is just a container, not *-virtualization pla

Re: suggetsed distro for Bind 

2025-07-23 Thread Robert McDonald
bind-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > bind-users-ow...@lists.isc.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it

Re: suggetsed distro for Bind

2025-07-23 Thread Ondřej Surý
Docker/Podman is just a container, not *-virtualization platform, so there’s full access to the underlying hardware. -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 23. 7. 2025,

Re: suggetsed distro for Bind

2025-07-23 Thread Michal Nowak
On 23/07/2025 15:10, Renzo Marengo wrote: Thank you very much, I verified and I'm interesting to: Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS / AlmaLinux 8, 9 what do I think  about Oracle Linux 9 ? It' based on RedHat code. It will work just fine as any other RHEL fork. -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/

RE: suggetsed distro for Bind

2025-07-23 Thread Marc
Then maybe rocky. CentOS is not the same any more. Although for just bind it does not matter that much > Thank you very much, I verified and I'm interesting to: > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS / AlmaLinux 8, 9 > > what do I think about Oracle Linux 9 ? It' based on RedHat code. > > >

Re: suggetsed distro for Bind

2025-07-23 Thread Renzo Marengo
Thank you very much, I verified and I'm interesting to: Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS / AlmaLinux 8, 9 what do I think about Oracle Linux 9 ? It' based on RedHat code. Il giorno mer 23 lug 2025 alle ore 15:05 Ondřej Surý ha scritto: > It would be best to pick something from a list of sup

Re: suggetsed distro for Bind

2025-07-23 Thread Carlos Horowicz via bind-users
I’m not sure if a container will pass through the CPU instruction set required to leverage hardware acceleration on newer (or even not-so-new) Intel processors. In KVM, for example, you have to enable it explicitly. One way to check for supported instructions is: grep -o -w 'aes\|sha_ni\|pclmu

Re: suggetsed distro for Bind

2025-07-23 Thread Ondřej Surý
It would be best to pick something from a list of supported platforms: https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9.20.11/chapter2.html#supported-platforms And then cross-check it with list of ISC provided packages (Fedora, RHEL-like, Debian, Ubuntu) if you want a base system that changes less often. Or

RE: suggetsed distro for Bind

2025-07-23 Thread Marc
Maybe consider running it in a container and keeping nice and small with alpine linux > > I'd like to migrate from bind 9.11 lo last version. > This service is acting as cache dns server and It' running on Centos 7 > server, what Linux distro do you suggest me for new Bind? -- Visit https://lis

Re: Reference to non-existent files in output from 9.18 rndc zonestatus

2025-07-16 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 9 Jul 2025, at 14:02, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > I'm baffled by something strange I came across yesterday, and would > appreciate an injection of clue. This seems to have been a case of PEBKAB. Apologies for the noise. Niall -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscr

Re: Bind 9.18: assert in dns_cache_create() cleanup branch

2025-07-11 Thread Stacey Marshall
On 10 Jul 2025, at 16:25, Ondřej Surý wrote: > current stable release (9.20) and the previous stable 9.18 is in the "deep > freeze" mode > where we only fix critical or security bugs Gosh, I hadn't appreciated that 9.18 was in the freezer, time does fly. - https://www.isc.org/download/ states it

Re: Bind 9.18: assert in dns_cache_create() cleanup branch

2025-07-10 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi Andreas, I'll also provide feedback to you here. We very much appreciate bug reports like this, where the submitter puts an effort to diagnose, describe and (possibly) fix the issue. Thank you for that. Unfortunately, this particular issue has been already fixed in the current stable release

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >