Sorry about that, the email might've been a bit too emotionally loaded.
The issues pile up.. and that's eventually the result.
I'm not using FreeBSD anywhere anymore but found some resources online
suggesting that the package name is bind916. The closest I could find to
unwinded is Unbound
On 7/20/2020 11:23 AM, Michael De Roover wrote:
If that is true, I hereby lost all faith in humanity.. well whatever
faith I had left. This has been going on for like half a decade now.
Nobody ever went broke catering to the human desire for ease
If that is true, I hereby lost all faith in humanity.. well whatever
faith I had left. This has been going on for like half a decade now.
A few weeks ago I saw here on the list someone suggesting that BIND is a
reference to bondage in BDSM, so perhaps it has to do with that... Lest
we forget
-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Ted
Mittelstaedt
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2020 12:57 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: AW: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?
Your personal experience is not the gobal truth. It is your opinion but other
experienced
> So as an experienced person who has been doing this you-nuxs thing since
> 1982 - I DON'T see it different - and in fact, I see it as a RETURN to
> what it originally was!
Exactly ! Hear hear ! Well said.
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and
: Friday, July 17, 2020 12:57 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: AW: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?
>
> Your personal experience is not the gobal truth. It is your opinion but other
> experienced pepole see it different than you.
>
Hmm I'
Your personal experience is not the gobal truth. It is your opinion but other
experienced pepole see it different than you.
Hmm I'm a bit late to this discussion but I will chime in with the
others. The service always was called "named" pronounced "name Dee"
it was called that in the
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 10:35 +0200, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Thanks for answer!
>
> So actually it is just a cosmetic change not addressing a real problem.
>
> I will miss the bind9 service :-(
Wait until you find out about Predicatable Network Interface Names and
iptables rules. :)
-Jim P.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020, Klaus Darilion wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: bind-users Im Auftrag von Reindl
Harald
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. April 2020 09:05
An: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Betreff: Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service
9 matches
Mail list logo
