On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message , Timothe Litt
> writes:
>> The most sensible thing to do is ignore the message, and keep named
>> reasonably up-to-date.
>
> Well something in the resolution path is changing the answer to
> return the old address which is
In message , Timothe Litt writes:
> The most sensible thing to do is ignore the message, and keep named
> reasonably up-to-date.
Well something in the resolution path is changing the answer to
return the old address which is why I suggested that there may
be a forwarder involved. One should
The most sensible thing to do is ignore the message, and keep named
reasonably up-to-date.
I used to maintain a local hints file with a script that periodically
downloads and updates it (from internic or the DNS), reconfiguring named
when it changes. It works well - but it's really not worth the
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017, Mark Andrews wrote:
I suspect that you are forwarding your queries and that your forwarder is
returning out-of-date addresses.
No forwarding here.
Jay Ford, Network Engineering Group, Information Te
I suspect that you are forwarding your queries and that your forwarder is
returning out-of-date addresses.
In message
,
Alberto Colosi writes:
> I haven't seen as from a while I have no servers to admin
>
> as I ever say to who I teach ... right source for right content. nist o=
> k but .
5 matches
Mail list logo