Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-05-05 Thread Sam Wilson
In article , Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:35:38AM +0100, > Sam Wilson wrote > a message of 22 lines which said: > > > > It seems (not tested by me) that Nominum CNS does that: when many > > > responses arrive which do not match (src IP address, query ID, etc) > >

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-05-05 Thread Sam Wilson
In article , sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > > > > I know of no such feature. What do you mean by "spoofed" anyway? How > > > > would you expect named to detect "spoofing", and is that its job? > > > > > > It seems (not tested by me) that Nominum CNS does that: when many > > > responses arrive which

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-05-05 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:35:38AM +0100, Sam Wilson wrote a message of 22 lines which said: > > It seems (not tested by me) that Nominum CNS does that: when many > > responses arrive which do not match (src IP address, query ID, etc) > > any pending answer, it switches to TCP, assuming someon

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-05-05 Thread sthaug
> > > I know of no such feature. What do you mean by "spoofed" anyway? How > > > would you expect named to detect "spoofing", and is that its job? > > > > It seems (not tested by me) that Nominum CNS does that: when many > > responses arrive which do not match (src IP address, query ID, etc) > > a

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-05-05 Thread Sam Wilson
In article , Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:59:11AM -0400, > Kevin Darcy wrote > a message of 21 lines which said: > > > I know of no such feature. What do you mean by "spoofed" anyway? How > > would you expect named to detect "spoofing", and is that its job? > > I

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-04-30 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:59:11AM -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote a message of 21 lines which said: > I know of no such feature. What do you mean by "spoofed" anyway? How > would you expect named to detect "spoofing", and is that its job? It seems (not tested by me) that Nominum CNS does that: when

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-04-28 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 4/28/2010 6:22 AM, kalpesh varyani wrote: Hi all, Please let me know if there is some feature in any of the versions of BIND, by which it switches to TCP when it detects spoofed replies. I am aware that BIND uses UDP for all its query / response and TCP for zone transfers. I know