Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-18 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:36:31 -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote: > > I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB. > > That cpu can address no more than 16 MB. > i have tried running 9.4.3 instead of 9.5.0-P2 and got odd results. I suspect you shou

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-17 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
Peter Dambier escreveu: I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB. That cpu can address no more than 16 MB. i have tried running 9.4.3 instead of 9.5.0-P2 and got odd results. 9.5.0-P2 right after start. Not a single query was made to it, just

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-15 Thread Sam Wilson
In article , sch...@adi.com (Thomas Schulz) wrote: > In article , > =?UTF-8?B?TGVvbmFyZG8gUm9kcmlndWVzIE1hZ2FsaMOjZXM=?= > wrote: > >[base64 guff] > > > You know, the above is not very usefull. Can someone please fix the > newsgroup gateway. The content is below. I forward it only be

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-15 Thread Thomas Schulz
In article , =?UTF-8?B?TGVvbmFyZG8gUm9kcmlndWVzIE1hZ2FsaMOjZXM=?= wrote: >CgpQZXRlciBEYW1iaWVyIGVzY3JldmV1Ogo+IEkgY2FuIGNvbmZpcm0gYmluZCA5LjQgZG9lcyBy >dW4gb24gYW4gKElCTSwgbm90IEludGVsKSA0ODYtU0NMLzIgd2l0aCAxNiBNQi4KPiBUaGF0IGNw >dSBjYW4gYWRkcmVzcyBubyBtb3JlIHRoYW4gMTYgTUIuCj4KPiAkIGNhdCA

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-15 Thread Дмитрий Рыбин
I just test bind 9.5.0-P2 and 9.5.1-rc1 Bind 9.5.0-P2 allocate over 2Gb per 10 minutes of work. Bind 9.5.1 allocate 2Gb per 30 hours. 14.12.2008, в 2:15, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 написал(а): At Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:50:52 -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote: i'm trying to run bind 9.5.0-P

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-14 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
Peter Dambier escreveu: I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB. That cpu can address no more than 16 MB. $ cat /proc/meminfo total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 14540800 10596352 398 3194880 1003520 3518464 very

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-14 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
JINMEI Tatuya / escreveu: question is is there something i can do to low bind's memory usage and successfully run it on those very low embedded devices ??? Admittedly, BIND9 tends to require a lot of memory. I'm not sure if it can reasonably function with a total system

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-13 Thread Peter Dambier
I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB. That cpu can address no more than 16 MB. $ cat /proc/meminfo total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 14540800 10596352 398 3194880 1003520 3518464 Swap: 133885952 11907072 121978880 MemTo

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-13 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:50:52 -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote: > i'm trying to run bind 9.5.0-P2 on a very low memory system. It's a > RouterBoard 450 with 32Mb RAM running OpenWRT. > > r...@sede:~# cat /proc/meminfo > MemTotal:29920 kB > > the problem is that bind se